2008 Bahar Sayı 10

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/16358

Browse

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5

Cognitive epistemology in redefining knowledge
(Uludağ Üniversitesi, 2008) Kutlusoy, Zekiye; Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi; Felsefe Bölümü
A careful analysis of knowing/knowledge of mind exhibits that there are two main distinct epistemic axes, namely knowing and knowledge axes, which should be considered together. They make up four different epistemic cases, and this framework contains the whole subject-domain of cognitive epistemology, which is a part of cognitive philosophy. On the other hand, epistemic gaps, appearing in this area, pave the way for some significant problems.
Esse est percipi in Berkeley's book "Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous"
(Uludağ Üniversitesi, 2008) Çiçekdağı, Caner; Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi; Felsefe Bölümü
This paper will try to remind Berkeley's thought on his book "Dialogues". The three names, John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume are clearly mentioned by British empiricism. Among these major names we're going to keep your attention to Berkeley. That' s because his empiricism differs from the others with the simple and highly radical point of view. The empiricist tradition always uses the word "idea" in a general meaning. "Idea" represents anything in our minds as thoughts, perceptions, feelings, imaginations, memories, ete., anything not belong to physical body. Things exist as long as they are being perceived. Material substance isn' t exist because we can' t perceive such a thing but ideas, like thoughts, imagines, sensations ete.
Hartmann's epistemology based on ontology and its contributions
(Uludağ Üniversitesi, 2008) Zafer, Zeynep; Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi; Felsefe Bölümü
Hartmann's claim that the problems which occur as a result of giving more importance to the subject than to the object on the assumption that knowledge is a product of a relation which is constituted between the subject and the object can be solved by the illumination of ontology is a significant contribution to both ontology and epistemology. In this study the issues concerning with what does it mean to look at epistemology from an ontological point of view, where do the subject and the object take place in an act of knowing and what contributes us noticing the epistemic relations differ in each strata of Being are discussed in the direction of presenting the new ontology's difference from the old ontologies.
The problem of knowledge in Hume's philosophy and Kant's attempt to solve it
(Uludağ Üniversitesi, 2008) Esenyel, Adnan; Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi; Felsefe Bölümü
The philosophical motion from Hume to Kant is a cornerstone in the history of philosophy. This is the motion which I will try to evaluate here. The problem of knowledge which was formulated by Hume shows us how the cartesian tradition since Descartes ' cogito finds itself in a blind alley. This is why Kant's attempt to solve that problem is very vital for epistemolgy. First of all we will see how Hume's empiricism ends with universal scepticism and I will try to show why he can not avoid that end. Then we will pass on Kant's response to Hume's scepticism. I will discuss whether his response is right and legitimate. In conclusion we will see that despite the strength which Kant's response possess, it contains also some unsolved problems which open door for scepticism.
Some remarks on Kant's contribution for understanding the nature of the transition from epistemology to ontology
(Uludağ Üniversitesi, 2008) Serin, İsmail; Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi; Felsefe Bölümü
lt is generally agreed that the philosophy of Kant is a turning point for modem philosophy. This corpus provides with us not only a method for analysing the nature of human knowledge in general, but also a basis upon which we find a possibility to establish antology derived from epistemology. This paper tries to understand the principles of this possibility described in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason.

Browse

Browsing by Department "Felsefe Bölümü"