2008 Bahar Sayı 10
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/16358
Browse
Browsing by Subject "Algı"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Dynamical interpretation of Leibniz's continuum(Uludağ Üniversitesi, 2008) Vidinsky, VassilThis dynamical interpretation of the continuum is based on a threefold perspective. First, detailed differentiation of all standard realms of Leibnizian Weltanschauung - (R real). (P phenomenal), (I ideal ). Second, analysis of the scope of the Law of Continuity famously formulated by Leibniz and mapping it on to this (RPI) structure. Third, fınding the precise place of dynamics and force in this (RPI) continuum. These perspectives (taxonomical, legislative and junctional) if put together lead to a new understanding of monads' role; and they are not taken anymore as a discreet part of Leibnizian philosophy (as opposed to the ideal space and time), but as dynamical continuum incorporating in itself both contiguity and continuity. And in such a way they are both neutra/izing and preserving the syncategorematic phenomenal infınity. The main poinı is that force can be applied both to perception and appetition of monads and by this we give the shortest Leibnizian answer to the Zeno's Dichotomy paradox- "force". But what is more important, such dynamical interpretation gives good schematic and systemade view of Leibnizian mature philosophy. And it appears (as expected) that the thread out of the Labyrinth of the Continuum is not only geometrical and physical, but metaphysical too.Item Esse est percipi in Berkeley's book "Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous"(Uludağ Üniversitesi, 2008) Çiçekdağı, Caner; Uludağ Üniversitesi/Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi/Felsefe Bölümü.This paper will try to remind Berkeley's thought on his book "Dialogues". The three names, John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume are clearly mentioned by British empiricism. Among these major names we're going to keep your attention to Berkeley. That' s because his empiricism differs from the others with the simple and highly radical point of view. The empiricist tradition always uses the word "idea" in a general meaning. "Idea" represents anything in our minds as thoughts, perceptions, feelings, imaginations, memories, ete., anything not belong to physical body. Things exist as long as they are being perceived. Material substance isn' t exist because we can' t perceive such a thing but ideas, like thoughts, imagines, sensations ete.