Person: ÖMER TOPÇU, DİLARA
Loading...
Email Address
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
ÖMER TOPÇU
First Name
DİLARA
Name
8 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
Publication Il-21: A potential biomarker for diagnosis and predicting prognosis in covid-19 patients(European Respiratory Society Journals, 2021-09-05) Öztürk, Nilüfer Aylin Acet; Ursavaş, Ahmet; Dilektaşlı, Aslı Görek; Demirdöğen, Ezgi; Coşkun, Funda; Ediger, Dane; Uzaslan, Esra; Yöyen-Ermiş, Diğdem; Karaca, Mert; Terzi, Orkun; Bayram, Merve; Ömer, Dilara; Yiğitliler, Büşra; Yurttaş, Ahmet; Maharramov, Shahriyar; Çelik, Gamze; Oral, Barbaros; Karadağ, Mehmet; ACET ÖZTÜRK, NİLÜFER AYLİN; URSAVAŞ, AHMET; GÖREK DİLEKTAŞLI, ASLI; DEMİRDÖĞEN, EZGİ; COŞKUN, NECMİYE FUNDA; EDİGER, DANE; UZASLAN, AYŞE ESRA; YÖYEN ERMİŞ, DİĞDEM; KARACA, MERT; TERZİ, ORKUN ERAY; BAYRAM, MERVE; ÖMER TOPÇU, DİLARA; YURTTAŞ, AHMET; ORAL, HALUK BARBAROS; KARADAĞ, MEHMET; MAHARRAMOV, SHAHRİYAR; YAZICI, GAMZE; Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi.; 0000-0002-6375-1472; 0000-0002-7400-9089; 0000-0003-3604-8826; 0000-0002-2954-4293; 0000-0001-5871-8769; 0000-0002-9027-1132; AAG-8744-2021; JPK-7012-2023; AAH-3888-2021; AAE-9142-2019; AAI-3169-2021; AAD-1271-2019Publication Impact of the revised EORTC/MSGERC 2020 criteria upon prognosis in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing bronchoscopy(European Respiratory Soc Journals, 2021-09-05) Topcu, Dilara Omer; Acer, Kubra Vurat; Guclu, Ozge Aydin; Pinar, Ibrahim Ethem; Demirdogen, Ezgi; Dilektasli, Asli Gorek; Kazak, Esra; Ozkocaman, Vildan; Ursavas, Ahmet; Akalin, Halis; Ozkalemtas, Fahir; Ener, Beyza; Ali, Ridvan; Ozturk, Nilufer Aylin Acet; ACET ÖZTÜRK, NİLÜFER AYLİN; ÖMER TOPÇU, DİLARA; VURAT ACAR, KÜBRA; AYDIN GÜÇLÜ, ÖZGE; PINAR, İBRAHİM ETHEM; DEMİRDÖĞEN, EZGİ; GÖREK DİLEKTAŞLI, ASLI; KAZAK, ESRA; ÖZKOCAMAN, VİLDAN; URSAVAŞ, AHMET; AKALIN, EMİN HALİS; Ozkalemtas, Fahir; ENER, BEYZA; ALİ, RIDVAN; Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Göğüs Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı.; Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/İç Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı.; Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Hematoloji Anabilim Dalı.; Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Enfeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı.; Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı.; 0000-0002-6375-1472; 0000-0003-1005-3205; 0000-0002-7400-9089; 0000-0001-7530-1279; 0000-0002-6375-1472; 0000-0003-1005-3205; 0000-0002-4803-8206; JGM-6601-2023; KHE-5423-2024; AAU-8952-2020; JPK-7012-2023; JWP-2738-2024; AAI-3169-2021; Z-1424-2019; JIF-7772-2023; CBS-8892-2022; AAG-9930-2019; CNP-1063-2022; AAG-8459-2021; FQG-8981-2022; FQJ-3657-2022; AAG-8523-2021; GXD-8209-2022Publication Interleukin-21: A potential biomarker for diagnosis and predicting prognosis in covid-19 patients(Tubitak Scientific & Technological Research Council Turkey, 2021-01-01) ACET ÖZTÜRK, NİLÜFER AYLİN; URSAVAŞ, AHMET; GÖREK DİLEKTAŞLI, ASLI; DEMİRDÖĞEN, EZGİ; COŞKUN, NECMİYE FUNDA; EDİGER, DANE; UZASLAN, AYŞE ESRA; YÖYEN ERMİŞ, DİĞDEM; KARACA, MERT; TERZİ, ORKUN ERAY; BAYRAM, MERVE; ÖMER TOPÇU, DİLARA; Yigitliler, Busra; YURTTAŞ, AHMET; Maharramov, Shahriyar; YAZICI, GAMZE; ORAL, HALUK BARBAROS; KARADAĞ, MEHMET; Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi.; 0000-0002-6375-1472; 0000-0001-7099-9647; 0000-0002-7400-9089; 0000-0003-3604-8826; 0000-0002-2954-4293; 0000-0001-5871-8769; 0000-0003-0463-6818; 0000-0002-9027-1132; AAG-7406-2021; AAD-1271-2019; AAH-3888-2021; K-7285-2012; AAG-8744-2021; AAI-3169-2021; JPK-7012-2023; AAE-9142-2019Background/aim: COVID-19 patients have a wide spectrum of disease severity. Several biomarkers were evaluated as predictors for progression towards severe disease. IL-21 is a member of common gamma-chain cytokine family and creates some specific effects during programming and maintenance of antiviral immunity. We aimed to assess IL-21 as a biomarker for diagnosis and outcome prediction in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Materials and methods: Patients with a preliminary diagnosis of COVID-19 and pneumonia other than COVID-19 admitted to a tertiary care hospital were included consecutively in this comparative study. Results: The study population consisted of 51 patients with COVID-19 and 11 patients with non-COVID-19 pneumonia. Serum IL-21 concentration was markedly higher, and serum CRP concentration was significantly lower in COVID-19 patients compared to nonCOVID-19 pneumonia patients. Within COVID-19 patients, 10 patients showed radiological and clinical progression. Patients with clinical worsening had lower lymphocyte count and haemoglobin. In addition to that, deteriorating patients had higher urea, LDH levels, and elevated concentration of both IL-6 and IL-21. The cut-off value of 106 ng/L for IL-21 has 80.0% sensitivity, %60.9 specificity for discriminating patients with clinical worsening. Multivariable analysis performed to define risk factors for disease progression identified IL-6 and IL-21 as independent predictors. Odds ratio for serum IL-6 concentrations >_ 3.2 pg/mL was 8.07 (95% CI: 1.3747.50, p = 0.04) and odds ratio for serum IL-21 concentrations >_ 106 ng/L was 6.24 (95% CI: 1.04 - 37.3, p = 0.02). Conclusion: We identified specific differences in serum IL-21 between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 pneumonia patients. Serum IL-21 measurement has promising predictive value for disease progression in COVID-19 patients. High serum IL-6 and IL-21 levels obtained upon admission are independent risk factors for clinical worsening.Publication Impact of posaconazole prophylaxis and antifungal treatment on BAL GM performance in hematology malignancy patients with febrile neutropenia: A real life experience(Springer, 2023-10-16) Acet-Öztürk, Nilüfer Aylin; Ömer-Topcu, Dilara; Vurat Acar, Kübra; Aydın-Güçlü, Özge; Pınar, İbrahim Ethem; Demirdoğen, Ezgi; Görek-Dilektasli, Aslı; Kazak, Esra; Özkocaman, Vildan; Ursavaş, Ahmet; Özkalemkaş, Fahir; Ener, Beyza; Ali, Rıdvan; Akalın, Halis; ACET ÖZTÜRK, NİLÜFER AYLİN; ÖMER TOPÇU, DİLARA; VURAT ACAR, KÜBRA; AYDIN GÜÇLÜ, ÖZGE; PINAR, İBRAHİM ETHEM; DEMİRDÖĞEN, EZGİ; GÖREK DİLEKTAŞLI, ASLI; KAZAK, ESRA; ÖZKOCAMAN, VİLDAN; URSAVAŞ, AHMET; ÖZKALEMKAŞ, FAHİR; ENER, BEYZA; ALİ, RIDVAN; AKALIN, EMİN HALİS; Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Göğüs Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı.; Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/İç Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı.; Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Hematoloji Anabilim Dalı.; Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Enfeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı.; Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı.; 0000-0002-6375-1472; 0000-0002-7400-9089; 0000-0001-7530-1279; AAI-3169-2021; JGM-6601-2023; Z-1424-2019; AAH-9812-2021; AAU-8952-2020; AAG-8459-2021; FRE-8778-2022; JQQ-5505-2023; GXD-8045-2022; JHW-9355-2023; FQG-8981-2022; JIW-1248-2023; CNK-0895-2022; GXD-8209-2022BackgroundDiagnostic accuracy of galactomannan measurements is highly variable depending on the study population, diagnostic procedures, and treatment procedures. We aimed to evaluate the effect of posaconazole prophylaxis and empiric antifungal treatment upon diagnostic accuracy of GM measurements in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), bronchial lavage (BL), and serum in hematological malignancy population.MethodsPatients hospitalized in a single tertiary care center with hematologic malignancies undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) with a preliminary diagnosis of IPA were retrospectively included.ResultsIn all the study population (n = 327), AUC for BAL, BL, and serum GM were as follows: 0.731 [0.666-0.790], 0.869 [0.816-0.912], and 0.610 [0.540-0.676] with BL samples having the best diagnostic value. GM measurements in patients under posaconazole prophylaxis (n = 114) showed similar diagnostic performance. While specificity was similar between patients with and without posaconazole prophylaxis, sensitivity of GM measurements was lower in patients with prophylaxis. Analyses with patient classified according to antifungal treatment at the time of FOB procedure (n = 166) showed a decreased diagnostic accuracy in serum GM and BAL GM measurements related with the duration of treatment. However, BAL, BL, and serum GM measurements presented similar sensitivity and specificity in higher cut-off values in longer durations of antifungal treatment.ConclusionOur study shows that posaconazole prophylaxis and active short-term (3 days) antifungal treatment do not significantly affect overall diagnostic performance of GM measurements in bronchoalveolar lavage and bronchial lavage samples. However, using different cut-off values for patients receiving active treatment might be suggested to increase sensitivity.Publication Impact of revised EORTC/MSGERC 2020 criteria on diagnosis and prognosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with hematological malignancies undergoing bronchoscopy(Masson Editeur, 2022-06-14) Acet-Öztürk, N. A.; Ömer-Topcu, D.; Vurat-Acar, K.; Aydın-Güçlü, O.; Pınar, I. E.; Demirdoğen, E.; Görek-Dilektaşli, A.; Kazak, E.; Özkocaman, V; Ursavaş, A.; Akalın, H.; Özkalemkas, F.; Ener, B.; Ali, R.; ACET ÖZTÜRK, NİLÜFER AYLİN; ÖMER TOPÇU, DİLARA; VURAT ACAR, KÜBRA; AYDIN GÜÇLÜ, ÖZGE; PINAR, İBRAHİM ETHEM; DEMİRDÖĞEN, EZGİ; GÖREK DİLEKTAŞLI, ASLI; KAZAK, ESRA; ÖZKOCAMAN, VİLDAN; URSAVAŞ, AHMET; AKALIN, EMİN HALİS; ÖZKALEMKAŞ, FAHİR; ENER, BEYZA; ALİ, RIDVAN; Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Göğüs Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı.; Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/İç Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı.; Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Hematoloji Anabilim Dalı.; Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Enfeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı.; Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı.; 0000-0001-9907-1498; 0000-0002-7380-2501; JII-3270-2023; FRE-8778-2022; GXC-7806-2022; GXD-8045-2022; JGM-6601-2023; JIA-5197-2023; CRM-4095-2022; CZK-6380-2022; JIR-6730-2023; AAI-3169-2021; EJJ-6847-2022; JIW-1248-2023; CNK-0895-2022; GXD-8209-2022Introduction: The first consensus definitions for invasive fungal diseases (IFD) were published in 2002. Advan-ces in diagnostic tests and a clear need for improvement in certain areas led to a revision of these definitions in 2008. However, growing data on Aspergillus galactomannan (GM) thresholds and the introduction of new polymerase chain reaction-based diagnostic tests resulted in a further update by EORTC and Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium (MSGERC) in 2020. Compared to the 2008 version, the 2020 EORTC/MSGERC criteria have stricter definitions, especially regarding GM levels, which should lead to improved specificity. Thus, our study aimed to evaluate diagnostic changes, based on GM levels, resulting from these new definitions and ascertain the impact of the new classification on mortality rates. Method: Patients hospitalized in a single tertiary care center with hematologic malignancies and undergoing bronchoscopy for suspected IPA between April 2004 and December 2019 were included in this retrospective study. Results: The study population consisted of 327 patients with 31 patients (nine patients with proven IPA and 22 patients with no IPA) excluded from the study. 194 patients were classified as probable IPA cases according to 2008 EORTC/MSG criteria. However, 53 (27.3%) of these patients were re-classified as possible IPA according to 2020 EORTC/MSGERC criteria, due to novel galactomannan cut-off levels. Compared to re-classified possible IPA patients, those remaining in the probable IPA category experienced a higher incidence of septic shock (34.0% vs 16.9%, p=0.02), and required more non-invasive (12.0% vs 0.0%, p=0.004) and invasive (44.6 vs 24.5%, p=0.01) mechanical ventilation. There was a higher in-hospital mortality rate in probable IPA patients than in the re-clas-sified possible IPA group (42.5% vs 22.6%, p=0.01). Patients reassigned to possible IPA had similar underlying dis-eases, radiological features and prognosis to patients already classified as possible IPA. Independent risk factors for mortality were classification as probable IPA according to 2020 EORTC/MSGERC criteria, lack of remission from hematologic malignancy, and number of nodules in Thorax CT. Conclusion: The use of 2020 EORTC/MSGERC criteria resulted in a 27.3% significant reduction in probable IPA diagnoses and created a more homogeneous category of patients with respect to treatment response, prog-nosis and mortality. Therefore, 2020 EORTC/MSGERC criteria afford more reliable mortality prediction than 2008 EORTC/MSG criteria.(c) 2022 SFMM. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.Publication Assessment of malnutrition with l1-skeletal muscle mass in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis patients and the effects on exacerbation(European Respiratory Soc Journals Ltd, 2023-09-09) Topcu, Dilara Omer; ÖMER TOPÇU, DİLARA; Dilektasli, Asli Gorek; GÖREK DİLEKTAŞLI, ASLI; Uzaslan, Esra Kunt; Uslu, Nevzat; USLU, NEVZAT; Karadag, Mehmet; KARADAĞ, MEHMET; Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi.; Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı.; 0000-0001-7099-9647; 0000-0002-9027-1132; AAG-8744-2021Publication Nutritional status in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis(European Respiratory Soc Journals Ltd, 2023-09-09) Topçu, Dilara Ömer; Dilektaşlı, Aslı Görek; Uzaslan, Esra Kunt; Karadağ, Mehmet; ÖMER TOPÇU, DİLARA; GÖREK DİLEKTAŞLI, ASLI; Uzaslan, Esra Kunt; KARADAĞ, MEHMET; Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Göğüs Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı; 0000-0001-7099-9647; 0000-0002-9027-1132; AAG-8744-2021; EAX-3214-2022; DTT-7416-2022; JXG-0828-2024Publication Development and validation of a simple risk scoring system for a COVİD-19 diagnostic prediction model(Tüberküloz ve Toraks, 2023-01-01) Güçlü, Özge Aydın; Ursavaş, Ahmet; Ocakoğlu, Gokhan; Demirdogen, Ezgi; Öztürk, Nilufer Aylin Acet; Topçu, Dilara Ömer; Terzi, Orkun Eray; Onal, Uğur; Dilektaşlı, Aslı Görek; Sağlık, İmran; Coşkun, Funda; Ediger, Dane; Uzaslan, Esra; AkalIn, Halis; Karadağ, Mehmet; AYDIN GÜÇLÜ, ÖZGE; URSAVAŞ, AHMET; OCAKOĞLU, GÖKHAN; DEMİRDÖĞEN, EZGİ; ACET ÖZTÜRK, NİLÜFER AYLİN; ÖMER TOPÇU, DİLARA; TERZİ, ORKUN ERAY; ÖNAL, UĞUR; GÖREK DİLEKTAŞLI, ASLI; SAĞLIK, İMRAN; COŞKUN, NECMİYE FUNDA; EDİGER, DANE; UZASLAN, AYŞE ESRA; AkalIn, Halis; KARADAĞ, MEHMET; Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Göğüs Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı; Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Biyoistatistik Anabilim Dalı; Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Enfeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı; 0000-0003-1005-3205; 0000-0002-1114-6051; 0000-0002-7400-9089; 0000-0002-6375-1472; 0000-0001-7099-9647; 0000-0002-2954-4293; 0000-0001-7530-1279; 0000-0002-9027-1132; AAH-5180-2021; A-4970-2019; AAG-8744-2021; AAI-3169-2021; JCO-3678-2023; JPK-7012-2023Introduction: In a resource-constrained situation, a clinical risk stratification system can assist in identifying individuals who are at higher risk and should be tested for COVID-19. This study aims to find a predictive scoring model to estimate the COVID-19 diagnosis.Materials and Methods: Patients who applied to the emergency pandemic clinic between April 2020 and March 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. At admission, demographic characteristics, symptoms, comorbid diseases, chest computed tomography (CT), and laboratory findings were all recorded. Development and validation datasets were created. The scoring system was performed using the coefficients of the odds ratios obtained from the multivariable logistic regression analysis.Results: Among 1187 patients admitted to the hospital, the median age was 58 years old (22-96), and 52.7% were male. In a multivariable analysis, typical radiological findings (OR= 8.47, CI= 5.48-13.10, p< 0.001) and dyspnea (OR= 2.85, CI= 1.71-4.74, p< 0.001) were found to be the two important risk factors for COVID-19 diagnosis, followed by myalgia (OR= 1.80, CI= 1.082.99, p= 0.023), cough (OR= 1.65, CI= 1.16-2.26, p= 0.006) and fatigue symptoms (OR= 1.57, CI= 1.06-2.30, p= 0.023). In our scoring system, dyspnea was scored as 2 points, cough as 1 point, fatigue as 1 point, myalgia as 1 point, and typical radiological findings were scored as 5 points. This scoring system had a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 76.3% for a cut-off value of >2, with a total score of 10 (p< 0.001).Conclusion: The predictive scoring system could accurately predict the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection, which gave clinicians a theoretical basis for devising immediate treatment options. An evaluation of the predictive