Comparison of the biological activities of high-density porous polyethylene implants and oxidized regenerated cellulose-wrapped diced cartilage grafts

dc.contributor.buuauthorUysal, Afşin Ç.
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖzbek, Serhat
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖzcan, Mesut
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi.tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-5441-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid7005410156tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid7005245657tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid7102067678tr_TR
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-14T12:50:39Z
dc.date.available2021-09-14T12:50:39Z
dc.date.issued2003-08
dc.descriptionBu çalışma, 27-30 Eylül 2001 tarihleri arasında İstanbul'da düzenlenen 23. Ulusal Türk Plastik Cerrahi Derneği Kongresinde sözlü bildiri olarak sunulmuştur.tr_TR
dc.description.abstractThe use of alloplastic materials in plastic surgery has become more extensive with advancement of autogenoustissue reconstruction techniques for the repair of defects, tissue augmentation, and the stabilization of bones. An ideal alloplastic material should be nonallergenic, noncarcinogenic, sterilizable, and easy to shape and should not cause rejection. Alloplastic material used for tissue augmentation should have a low rate of resorption and distortion. High-density porous polyethylene implants (Medpor) have been used widely and successfully for tissue augmentation. The Turkish Delight is a material composed of diced cartilage grafts wrapped in oxidized regenerated cellulose (Surgicel). Its indications are similar to those of the Medpor implant, and an additional donor site is usually not needed. Both materials are used in the same anatomical locations, especially for augmentation. Therefore, the authors evaluated the long-term stability of and suitable anatomical sites for these materials. Medpor implants or Turkish Delights were placed subperiosteally or subfascially in 10 young rabbits, and the resultant changes were evaluated 16 weeks after the operation by macroscopy and histopathology. Changes in projections were measured with an ocular micrometer. Medpor implants were neither resorbed nor distorted when placed subperiosteally or subfascially, and were highly stabilized by the surrounding tissues. Turkish Delight also enabled tissue augmentation, but had a significantly higher rate of resorption compared with the Medpor implant and was loosely bound to the surrounding tissue. The Turkish Delight was less resorbed and better fixed to adjacent tissues when placed subperiosteally than when placed subfascially.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTurkish Soc Plast Surgen_US
dc.identifier.citationUysal, A.Ç. vd. (2003). “Comparison of the biological activities of high-density porous polyethylene implants and oxidized regenerated cellulose-wrapped diced cartilage grafts”. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 112(2), 540-546.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage546tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn0032-1052
dc.identifier.issue2tr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed12900612tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0042631383tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage540tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000070967.06488.63
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg/Citation/2003/08000/Comparison_of_the_Biological_Activities_of.21.aspx
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/21952
dc.identifier.volume112tr_TR
dc.identifier.wos000184532700021tr_TR
dc.indexed.pubmedPubmeden_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.wosCPCISen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.journalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectReconstructionen_US
dc.subjectMedporen_US
dc.subjectAugmentationen_US
dc.subjectBiomaterialsen_US
dc.subjectContouren_US
dc.subjectBoneen_US
dc.subject.emtreeOxidized regenerated celluloseen_US
dc.subject.emtreePolyethyleneen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAllograften_US
dc.subject.emtreeCartilage graften_US
dc.subject.emtreeDensityen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDeviceen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDrug activityen_US
dc.subject.emtreeEvaluationen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFasciaen_US
dc.subject.emtreeGraft rejectionen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHistopathologyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeImplanten_US
dc.subject.emtreeJoint stabilityen_US
dc.subject.emtreeOcular micrometeren_US
dc.subject.emtreeOrthopedic surgeryen_US
dc.subject.emtreeOsteolysisen_US
dc.subject.emtreePlastic surgeryen_US
dc.subject.emtreePorosityen_US
dc.subject.emtreePriority journalen_US
dc.subject.emtreeProsthesis fixationen_US
dc.subject.emtreeProsthesis materialen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRabbiten_US
dc.subject.emtreeRetroperitoneumen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSkin defecten_US
dc.subject.emtreeSurgical techniqueen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTissue reactionen_US
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_US
dc.subject.meshBiocompatible materialsen_US
dc.subject.meshCartilageen_US
dc.subject.meshCellulose, oxidizeden_US
dc.subject.meshEar cartilagesen_US
dc.subject.meshImplants, experimentalen_US
dc.subject.meshMuscle, skeletalen_US
dc.subject.meshPolyethylenesen_US
dc.subject.meshRabbitsen_US
dc.subject.meshReconstructive surgical proceduresen_US
dc.subject.meshSkullen_US
dc.subject.scopusNose Reconstruction; Costal Cartilage; Nasal Boneen_US
dc.subject.wosSurgeryen_US
dc.titleComparison of the biological activities of high-density porous polyethylene implants and oxidized regenerated cellulose-wrapped diced cartilage graftsen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.typeProceedings Paper
dc.wos.quartileQ1en_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: