Penile plication with or without degloving of the penis results in similar outcomes
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Kadirov, Rüstam | |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Coşkun, Burhan | |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Kaygısız, Onur | |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Günseren, Kadir Ömür | |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Kordan, Yakup | |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Yavaşçaoğlu, İsmet | |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Kılıçarslan, Hakan | |
dc.contributor.department | Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Üroloji Anabilim Dalı. | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-9790-7295 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0001-8673-3093 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.researcherid | L-9439-2019 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.researcherid | AAH-9704-2021 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.researcherid | AAM-9726-2020 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.researcherid | ABC-9924-2020 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 57194857067 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 36113105900 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 16637252400 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 56664496600 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 9633365800 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 6603612497 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 56007473800 | tr_TR |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-05T07:06:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-05T07:06:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-05-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Penile plication techniques with or without degloving offer a minimally invasive option for the treatment of penile curvature. Aim: To review the outcomes of penile plication surgery and patient satisfaction with and without degloving of the penis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 52 patients who underwent penile plication for the treatment of Peyronie disease or congenital penile curvature. Outcomes: Surgical success rates, complications, and patient satisfaction determined with the Treatment Benefit Scale were compared between groups. Results: The overall surgical success rate was 92.3% at a mean follow- up of 18.84 +/- 23.51 months. There were no intraoperative complications. In the degloving group, 42.6% of patients were greatly satisfied and 42.6% had better outcomes; in the without degloving group, 61.5% of patients were greatly satisfied and 30.8% had better outcomes. Comparison of outcomes was not statistically significant between groups. Clinical Implications: The results of the present study indicate the two techniques can be used for penile plication. Conclusion: With or without degloving, penile plication is safe and effective and provides high patient satisfaction. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Kadirov, R. vd. (2017). ''Penile plication with or without degloving of the penis results in similar outcomes''. Sexual Medicine, 5(3), E142-E147. | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | E147 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.issn | 2050-1161 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.pubmed | 28711404 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85023601545 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.startpage | E142 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2017.05.001 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S205011611730034X | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11452/30268 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 5 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.wos | 000410676800002 | tr_TR |
dc.indexed.pubmed | PubMed | en_US |
dc.indexed.scopus | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indexed.wos | SCIE | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Sexual Medicine | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi | tr_TR |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | General & internal medicine | en_US |
dc.subject | Urology & nephrology | en_US |
dc.subject | Congenital penile curvature | en_US |
dc.subject | Degloving | en_US |
dc.subject | Penile plication | en_US |
dc.subject | Peyronie's disease | en_US |
dc.subject | Peyronies-disease | en_US |
dc.subject | Tunical plication | en_US |
dc.subject | Curvature | en_US |
dc.subject | Deformities | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Clinical effectiveness | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Degloving plication technique | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Foley balloon catheter | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Human | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Intermethod comparison | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Length of stay | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Major clinical study | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Minimally invasive surgery | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Operation duration | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Patient satisfaction | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Penile plication | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Peyronie disease | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Postoperative period | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Priority journal | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Retrospective study | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Surgical technique | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Urologic surgery | en_US |
dc.subject.scopus | Peyronie Disease; Clostridiopeptidase A; Penis | en_US |
dc.subject.wos | Medicine, general & internal | en_US |
dc.subject.wos | Urology & nephrology | en_US |
dc.title | Penile plication with or without degloving of the penis results in similar outcomes | en_US |
dc.type | Article |