A comparison of energy use in organic and conventional tomato production

dc.contributor.buuauthorTurhan, Şule
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖzbaş, Başak Canan
dc.contributor.buuauthorRehber, Erkan
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Ziraat Fakültesi/Tarım Ekonomisi Bölümü.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9155-8170tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-8086-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid15822717900tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid15822920800tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6506098192tr_TR
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-28T12:06:45Z
dc.date.available2024-03-28T12:06:45Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.description.abstractThe organic agriculture began in 1985-1986 production year in Turkey thanks to the fact that the companies in Europe demanded organic products and introduced this production technique to the producers. Organic farming was begun with traditional exportation crops such as raisins, dried fig, dried apricot, hazelnut, chickpea, beans, lentil, olive and olive oil. Tomato production is very important for Turkey in terms of both domestic consumption and exports. The total value of tomato exports of Turkey in 2004 is 109,563,000$ and it constitutes 25% of the total vegetable exports of Turkey in 2004. Organic tomato processed into tomato paste is one of the organic export products of Turkey. Energy auditing is one of the most common approaches of examining energy efficiency and environmental impacts of the production system. The energy consumption patterns in organic and conventional tomato production in Canakkale province of Turkey were investigated in this study. The findings of this study show that energy consumption in organic tomato production per decare is 40.7% and per ton 8% less than in conventional tomato production. The energy output-input efficiency ratio in organic tomato production (0.213) is higher than in conventional tomato production (0.197). While the direct and renewable energy consumption of organic production is higher, the indirect and non-renewable energy consumption is lower than in conventional production. Benefit/cost ratios for organic and conventional tomato production are 2.73 and 2.18. The results also imply that organic tomato production is more profitable for farmers compared to conventional production.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTurhan, S. vb. (2008). "A comparison of energy use in organic and conventional tomato production". Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 6(3-4), 318-321.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage321tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn1459-0255
dc.identifier.issn1459-0263
dc.identifier.issue3-4tr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-55249099115tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage318tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/40651en_US
dc.identifier.volume6tr_TR
dc.identifier.wos000260597200065
dc.indexed.pubmedPubmeden_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWfl Publicationen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Food, Agriculture and Environmenten_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBenefit/cost ratioen_US
dc.subjectConventional tomatoen_US
dc.subjectEnergy efficiency ratioen_US
dc.subjectEnergy useen_US
dc.subjectOrganic tomatoen_US
dc.subjectCicer arietinumen_US
dc.subjectCorylusen_US
dc.subjectLens culinarisen_US
dc.subjectLycopersicon esculentumen_US
dc.subjectPrunus armeniacaen_US
dc.subjectFood science & technologyen_US
dc.subjectEconomic-analysisen_US
dc.subjectSystemsen_US
dc.subject.scopusGreenhouse Gas Emission; Life Cycle Assessment; Chemical Fertilizeren_US
dc.subject.wosFood science & technologyen_US
dc.titleA comparison of energy use in organic and conventional tomato productionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.wos.quartileQ4en_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections