Mutezile ve tasavvuf
Date
2001
Authors
Sobieroj, Florian
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Uludağ Üniversitesi
Abstract
Bütün görüntülerin aksine tasavvuf ve Mutezile ortak köklere sahiptirler. Tasavvufun kurucularından kabul edilen Hasan-ı Basrî (ö.110/728) ilk Mutezilîler’den olan Vâsıl b. Ata’nın hocası olarak bilinir. Bununla birlikte Mutezile ve ehl-i sünnetin farklı mezhepler halinde gelişmeleri ve sûfilerin de genelde sünni kanatta yer almaları nedeniyle, sözü edilen ortak miras zamanla gözden kaybolmuştur. İlerleyen dönemde, bu iki grup birbirlerini acımasız bir biçimde eleştirmeye başlamışlardır.
Contrary to all appearances, Sufism and the Mu’tazila share common roots. Al-Hasan al-Basrî (d.110/728), considered one of the founding fathers of Sufism, is known to have been the teacher of Wâsil b. Atâ’, who is associated with the origins of the Mu’tazila. However, as the Mu’tazila and the ahl al-sunna wa’l-jama’a developed into seperate denominations, with the Sufis by and large being members of the Sunni community, their common heritage was soon lost sight of. As the time passed they started to criticize each other harshly.
Contrary to all appearances, Sufism and the Mu’tazila share common roots. Al-Hasan al-Basrî (d.110/728), considered one of the founding fathers of Sufism, is known to have been the teacher of Wâsil b. Atâ’, who is associated with the origins of the Mu’tazila. However, as the Mu’tazila and the ahl al-sunna wa’l-jama’a developed into seperate denominations, with the Sufis by and large being members of the Sunni community, their common heritage was soon lost sight of. As the time passed they started to criticize each other harshly.
Description
Bu makalenin orijinali, Frederick de Jong ve Bernd Radtke’nin editörlüğünde hazırlanan “Islamic Mysticism Contested” (Leiden 1999) adlı eserin 68-92 sayfaları arasında yayımlanmıştır.
Keywords
Tasavvuf, Mutezile, Sûfiler, Abdülvâhid b. Zeyd, Sufism, Mu’tazila
Citation
Sobieroj, F. (2001). "Mutezile ve tasavvuf". çev. Salih Çift. Uludağ Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 273-296.