Analysis of the fracture morphology of polyamide, polyester, polypropylene, and silk sutures before and after implantation in vivo

dc.contributor.buuauthorKaraca, Esra
dc.contributor.buuauthorHockenberger, Aslı Şengönül
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Mühendislik Fakültesi/Tekstil Mühendisliği Bölümü.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1777-3977tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAS-8480-2020
dc.contributor.researcheridGWA-4691-2022
dc.contributor.scopusid17344029200tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6507435813tr_TR
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-07T11:02:28Z
dc.date.available2024-03-07T11:02:28Z
dc.date.issued2008-11
dc.description.abstractThis study has analyzed fracture morphology of four nonabsorbable commercially available sutures before and after implantation in rats. Also, tensile and knot strength retention have been evaluated after 3 and 8 weeks in vivo. Scanning electron and optical light microscopes were used for analysis of fracture morphologies and surface changes of the sutures. A clear effect of in vivo on the tensile and knot strength changes, and the fracture mechanism was seen for braided sutures. The suture size was also important for braided sutures, as fibrous tissue formation plays an important role in terms of the size. The fiber's surface properties were also important for the fracture morphology. A smooth and even surface was not suitable for the fibrous tissue formation as seen in monofilament sutures. Therefore, the polymer type was very important for the monofilament sutures, as it was the most important parameter to determine the fracture morphology and was not affected by the implantation and the implantation time. The size of the suture was also important for the polypropylene in terms of axial splitting before and after implantation. This, however, was not the case for knot strength tests. The knot was undone regardless of the size. Surface characteristics were very important for braided sutures, as they have a rough surface that supports tissue formation on the fracture mechanism, tensile and knot strength. Silk suture has single filaments with no regular diameter and smooth surface. Therefore, silk suture has more tissue formation postimplantation compared to polyester suture.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKaraca, E. ve Hockenberger, A.S. (2008). "Analysis of the fracture morphology of polyamide, polyester, polypropylene,and silk sutures before and after implantation in vivo". Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials, 87B(2), 580-589.en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31136
dc.identifier.endpage589tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn1552-4973
dc.identifier.issue2tr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed18506829tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-55049137127tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage580tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jbm.b.31136
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/40266
dc.identifier.volume87Btr_TR
dc.identifier.wos000260355000034tr_TR
dc.indexed.pubmedPubmeden_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterialen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnatomyen_US
dc.subjectAnimal fibersen_US
dc.subjectFractureen_US
dc.subjectMicroscopesen_US
dc.subjectOptical instrumentsen_US
dc.subjectPolyamidesen_US
dc.subjectPolyestersen_US
dc.subjectPolypropyleneen_US
dc.subjectScanning electron microscopyen_US
dc.subjectThermoplasticsen_US
dc.subjectABS resinsen_US
dc.subjectFractureen_US
dc.subjectMorphologyen_US
dc.subjectPlastic productsen_US
dc.subjectPolymersen_US
dc.subjectSilken_US
dc.subjectThermoplasticsen_US
dc.subjectFracture morphologyen_US
dc.subjectIn vivoen_US
dc.subjectNonabsorbableen_US
dc.subjectStrength lossen_US
dc.subjectSurface propertiesen_US
dc.subjectFracture morphologyen_US
dc.subjectIn vivoen_US
dc.subjectNonabsorbableen_US
dc.subjectStrength lossen_US
dc.subjectSutureen_US
dc.subjectKnot performanceen_US
dc.subjectMechanical-propertiesen_US
dc.subjectTensile propertiesen_US
dc.subjectResistanceen_US
dc.subjectinfectionen_US
dc.subjectStrengthen_US
dc.subjectBehavioren_US
dc.subjectRatsen_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.subjectMaterials scienceen_US
dc.subject.emtreePolyamideen_US
dc.subject.emtreePolyesteren_US
dc.subject.emtreePolypropyleneen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAnimal experimenten_US
dc.subject.emtreeFibrous tissue formationen_US
dc.subject.emtreeImplantationen_US
dc.subject.emtreeKnot strengthen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMicroscopeen_US
dc.subject.emtreeNonhumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeOptical light microscopeen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRaten_US
dc.subject.emtreeReviewen_US
dc.subject.emtreeScanning electron microscopeen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSilken_US
dc.subject.emtreeStrengthen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSurface propertyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSutureen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTensile strengthen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTissueen_US
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_US
dc.subject.meshBombyxen_US
dc.subject.meshNylonsen_US
dc.subject.meshPolyestersen_US
dc.subject.meshPolypropylenesen_US
dc.subject.meshRatsen_US
dc.subject.meshSilken_US
dc.subject.meshSurface propertiesen_US
dc.subject.meshSuture techniquesen_US
dc.subject.meshSuturesen_US
dc.subject.meshTensile strengthen_US
dc.subject.scopusKnots; Sutures; Tyingen_US
dc.subject.wosEngineering, biomedicalen_US
dc.subject.wosMaterials science, biomaterialsen_US
dc.titleAnalysis of the fracture morphology of polyamide, polyester, polypropylene, and silk sutures before and after implantation in vivoen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: