Person:
HAYRAN, YELİZ

Profile Picture

Email Address

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

OrgUnit Logo
Organizational Unit

Job Title

Last Name

HAYRAN

First Name

YELİZ

Name

Filters

20231
Reset filters

Settings

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Adhesive bond strength of monolithic zirconia ceramic finished with various surface treatments
    (BMC, 2023-11-13) Sarıkaya, Işıl; Hayran, Yeliz; HAYRAN, YELİZ; Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi; Protetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı; 0000-0002-2172-4724; JCE-6197-2023
    Background This study aimed to investigate different surface treatments thought to increase the bond strength between zirconia ceramic and adhesive resin cement.MethodsThe samples were prepared in 15 x 10 x 2 mm dimensions by cutting off monolithic zirconia ceramic blocks (Incoris TZI; Sirona, Germany). Surface roughness measurements were made with a profilometer, the average surface roughness (Ra1) was recorded, and five different surface treatments were applied. Group 1: Control group. No surface treatment was applied. Group 2: Sandblasted with Al2O3 under pressure of 50 mu m. Group 3: Sandblasted with 30 mu m Al2O3 - SiOx under pressure, then tribochemical silica coating, silane bonding agent, and ceramic primer were applied. Group 4: Samples were etched in a hot acid solution containing methanol, HCl, and chloride at 100 degrees C. Group 5: Samples were coated in a solution containing Grade C Aluminum Nitrite at 75 degrees C for 15 Sects. 12,000 thermal aging was carried out to all samples. Then, samples were bonded to a composite surface (Filtek Z250) with two different types of adhesive cement (Panavia F 2.0, Rely X U200) (n = 10). A load was applied to the samples attached to the Universal Test Device for the SBS, and the SBS was recorded. The surface roughness measurements of all samples were made again, and the average surface roughness Ra2 was recorded. The data was analyzed with a two-way ANOVA test. Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparisons of the groups. p = 0.005 was accepted as the statistically significant value.Results There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the Ra1 measurements (p = 0.031). There was a statistically significant difference between the Ra2 values of Groups 4 and 5 and the Ra2 values of Groups 1,2 and 3 in the Ra2 measurements (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the SBS values of the groups (p > 0.005). Also, there was no statistically significant difference in the SBS values of all groups for the two different cements tested (p > 0.005).Conclusions None of the surface treatments applied to monolithic zirconia ceramic samples increased the SBS between ceramic and adhesive resin cement.