Publication:
Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by ultrasound pachymetry, corneal topography, spectral domain- optical coherence tomography, and non-contact specular microscopy

dc.contributor.authorUlutaş, Hafize Gökben
dc.contributor.authorHamidi, Nagihan Amuk
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖzkaya, Güven
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖZKAYA, GÜVEN
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Biyoistatistik Anabilim Dalı.
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0297-846X
dc.contributor.researcheridA-4421-2016
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-22T11:07:31Z
dc.date.available2024-10-22T11:07:31Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-12
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study aims to investigate the compatibility of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), Scheimpflug-Placido-based corneal topography (CT), non-contact specular microscopy (NCSM), and ultrasonic pachymetry (UP). These four corneal measurement techniques have not been compared in a single study on these many subjects. Methods: CCT was measured in 185 eyes of 185 volunteers with each of the four devices by a single observer. CCTs from Optovue (R) iVue SD-OCT, Sirius corneal topography, NonconRobo NCSM, and Accutom UP devices were recorded. Compatibility between devices was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. Pairwise comparisons were performed using the Bonferroni test. Measurement differences between devices were analyzed with the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: Of the 185 volunteers, 103 were men, and 82 were women. Their mean age was 48.55 +/- 16.6 (18-70) years. Mean CCT values measured by UP, CT, OCT, and NCSM were 546.77 +/- 39.2, 535.29 +/- 39.2, 526.49 +/- 39.05, 505.15 +/- 46.1 mu m, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found between the mean CCT values obtained from the paired devices (p <0.001). The highest difference between pairs was found between UP and NCSM (43.63 +/- 1.8 mu m; CI 38.74 to 48.5 mu m; p <0.001), while the lowest difference was found between OCT and CT (7.3 +/- 1.5 mu m; 95%CI 3.1 to 11.6 mu m; p <0.001). In pairwise comparisons of four devices, the highest ICC value was between UP and CT (ICC: 0.899, 95%CI 0.759-0.947; p <0.001). Conclusion: Despite the high correlation between measurements obtained from different methods, notable differences in CCT values exist, rendering devices non-interchangeable. Therefore, alternative brands of the same device may yield different outcomes.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103527
dc.identifier.issn1572-1000
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103527
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/46839
dc.identifier.volume42
dc.identifier.wos000984932200001
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.journalPhotodiagnosis And Photodynamic Therapy
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectScheimpflug camera
dc.subjectAgreement
dc.subjectPentacam
dc.subjectDevices
dc.subjectCentral corneal thickness
dc.subjectSirius topography
dc.subjectOptic coherence tomography
dc.subjectSpecular microscopy
dc.subjectUltrasonic pachymetry
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectOncology
dc.titleComparison of central corneal thickness measured by ultrasound pachymetry, corneal topography, spectral domain- optical coherence tomography, and non-contact specular microscopy
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication648e85b9-2f4f-4f92-a2d7-794286abd0fd
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery648e85b9-2f4f-4f92-a2d7-794286abd0fd

Files

Collections