Publication:
From where does the uterine artery originate? A prospective, observational laparoscopic anatomic study

dc.contributor.authorTaşkıran, Çağatay
dc.contributor.authorVatansever, Doğan
dc.contributor.buuauthorOrhan, Adnan
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖzerkan, Kemal
dc.contributor.buuauthorKasapoglu, Işıl
dc.contributor.buuauthorSendemir, Erdoğan
dc.contributor.buuauthorUncu, Gürkan
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Anabilim Dalı.
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Anatomi Anabilim Dalı.
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7558-8166
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9699-4342
dc.contributor.researcheridV-5292-2019
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-9791-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridAAT-3479-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridV-5292-2019
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-9791-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridAAT-3479-2021
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-30T06:55:50Z
dc.date.available2024-05-30T06:55:50Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-01
dc.description.abstractStudy Objective: To determine and categorize the anatomic variations of the uterine artery (UA) as observed during laparoscopic hysterectomy with retroperitoneal dissection for benign conditions.Design: A prospective, observational study.Setting: A hospital department of obstetrics and gynecology, Uludag University Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.Patients: A total of 378 female patients who presented with indications for laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease.Interventions: Laparoscopic hysterectomy with retroperitoneal dissection was performed bilaterally in all patients between March 2014 and October 2018. The vascular anatomy beginning at the bifurcation of the common iliac artery down to the crossing of the UA with the ureter was exposed and subsequently studied. The UA was identified, and its variable branching patterns were recorded. The patterns were then categorized into groups adapted from classic vascular anatomy studies.Measurements and Main Results: Retroperitoneal dissections of 756 UAs were performed in 378 female patients. The UA was the first anterior branch of the internal iliac artery in 80.9% of the cases (Model 1; Main Model). Three additional models adequately described other variations of the UA as follows: Model 2 (Cross Model), 3.7%; Model 3 (Trifurcation Model), 3.1%; and Model 4 (Inverted-Y Model), 7.4%. The origin of the UA could not be determined in 7.4% of the cases.Conclusion: The UA is the first anterior branch of the internal iliac artery in more than 80% of females. Surgeons should be aware of the anatomic variations of the UA to perform safe and efficient procedures.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jmig.2019.07.031
dc.identifier.endpage1086
dc.identifier.issn1553-4650
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.startpage1081
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.07.031
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/41553
dc.identifier.volume27
dc.identifier.wos000562154900032
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.journalJournal Of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectHypogastric artery
dc.subjectEmbolization
dc.subjectUterine artery anatomy
dc.subjectRetroperitoneal dissection
dc.subjectLaparoscopic hysterectomy
dc.subjectUterine artery variations
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectObstetrics & gynecology
dc.subjectObstetrics & gynecology
dc.titleFrom where does the uterine artery originate? A prospective, observational laparoscopic anatomic study
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Collections