Publication:
Reason for inconsistency between ph monitoring and impedance in detecting acid gastroesophageal reflux: PH-only events

dc.contributor.authorParlak, Ayşe
dc.contributor.authorDoğruyol, Hasan
dc.contributor.buuauthorPARLAK, AYŞE
dc.contributor.buuauthorDoğruyol, Hasan
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentÇocuk Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7686-2561
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-6766-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridETC-9949-2022
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-25T07:36:02Z
dc.date.available2024-06-25T07:36:02Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Acid reflux events detected by pH and not identified by impedance are called 'pH only events'. We aimed to explain the incidence and the possible reasons of 'pH- only events'.Materials and Methods: The automated multichannel intraluminal impedance (Mil) analysis in 50 cases was investigated. Changes in impedance channels during pH-only acid reflux events were examined and grouped. 1. Events that fail to meet the impedance measurement criteria 2. Events with no change in impedance channels 3. Events that meet the impedance criteria, but do not have signs of reflux 4. Artifact 5. Positive deflection due to air.Results: The number of acid reflux events detected in the Mil records was 1475, the number of acid reflux events detected in the pH meter was 3093, and the number of pH-only acid reflux events was 1736. 56.1% of the acid reflux events were detected by pH meter not identified by MII. The most common reasons for this were events no changes in impedance channels (68%) and other reasons such as positive deflection due to air (14%), and events that could not meet impedance measurement criteria (10%). 8% of pH-only events that met MII criteria, but were not accepted as reflux by MII.Conclusions: There was more than half of acid reflux events detected by pH meter but not identified by MIL The reason of this situation has been not clear. For the correct decision, it is important to evaluate Mil recordings together with pH meter results rather than evaluating automatic analysis alone.
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/jcp.2021.0030
dc.identifier.eissn1308-6308
dc.identifier.endpage247
dc.identifier.issn1304-9054
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage241
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/jcp.2021.0030
dc.identifier.urihttps://guncelpediatri.com/articles/doi/jcp.2021.0030
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/42335
dc.identifier.volume19
dc.identifier.wos000791557000011
dc.indexed.wosWOS.ESCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGalenos Publ House
dc.relation.journalGüncel Pediatri Dergisi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectMultichannel intraluminal impedance
dc.subjectClassic 2-phase
dc.subjectInfants
dc.subjectAssociation
dc.subjectChildren
dc.subjectMultichannel intraluminal impedance
dc.subjectAcid gastroesophageal reflux
dc.subjectPh-only events
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectPediatrics
dc.titleReason for inconsistency between ph monitoring and impedance in detecting acid gastroesophageal reflux: PH-only events
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi/Çocuk Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalı
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1e3759a3-e0af-4b8d-80b4-f5fd3c639f30
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery1e3759a3-e0af-4b8d-80b4-f5fd3c639f30

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Parlak_ve_Doğruyol_2021.pdf
Size:
708.8 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections