Publication:
Ecological characteristics and habitat preferences of ostracoda (Crustacea) with a new bisexual population record (MSGLA, Turkey)

dc.contributor.authorAkdemir, D.
dc.contributor.authorKulkoyluoğlu, O.
dc.contributor.authorYavuzatmaca, M.
dc.contributor.authorTanyeri, M.
dc.contributor.authorGürer, M.
dc.contributor.authorAlper, A.
dc.contributor.authorDere, Şükran
dc.contributor.authorCelen, E.
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, O.
dc.contributor.authorOezcan, G.
dc.contributor.buuauthorDERE, ŞÜKRAN
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi/Biyoloji Bölümü
dc.contributor.researcheridCNS-5761-2022
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-19T11:43:43Z
dc.date.available2024-07-19T11:43:43Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.description.abstractIn order to compare the ecological characteristics of non-marine ostracods with different reproductive modes, 68 sites including 11 different habitat types were examined in the province of Mugla during July of 2014. A total of 28 taxa were found and 11 of them were new reports for Mugla. Sexual populations of Psychrodromus olivaceus and P. fontinalis were encountered from the same sampling site. Males of the latter species were reported for the first time from Turkey. The female/male ratio of these species was higher at low altitudes while it was about the same at medium altitudes. Numbers of species in sexual and/or parthenogenetic populations with/without swimming setae and individuals in natural and artificial habitats did not show significant difference (P > 0.05). Troughs were described as the richest habitats for ostracods. The first two axes of Canonical Correspondence Analysis explained 66.2% of the relationships between species and environmental variables when the water temperature was the most effective factor on species composition (P < 0.01). Results suggest that type of reproductive modes did not show significant relationship with species distribution among different water bodies. Hence, it seems distribution of species is most probably affected by several biotic and abiotic factors.
dc.identifier.doi10.15666/aeer/1801_14711487
dc.identifier.eissn1785-0037
dc.identifier.endpage1487
dc.identifier.issn1589-1623
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage1471
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1801_14711487
dc.identifier.urihttps://aloki.hu/pdf/1801_14711487.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/43339
dc.identifier.volume18
dc.identifier.wos000518377600096
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAloki Applied Ecological Research and Forensic Inst Ltd
dc.relation.journalApplied Ecology and Environmental Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.relation.tubitak213O172
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectReproduction
dc.subjectRegion
dc.subjectNiche
dc.subjectBolu
dc.subjectNon-marine species
dc.subjectDistribution
dc.subjectNatural-artificial habitats
dc.subjectAltitudes
dc.subjectSwimming ability
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectEcology
dc.subjectEnvironmental sciences
dc.titleEcological characteristics and habitat preferences of ostracoda (Crustacea) with a new bisexual population record (MSGLA, Turkey)
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb9f48428-fa81-4fca-8e60-045f8d448398
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryb9f48428-fa81-4fca-8e60-045f8d448398

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Dere_vd_2020.pdf
Size:
586.79 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections