Publication:
Comparison of carbon footprints of different livestock operations

dc.contributor.authorKilic, Ilker
dc.contributor.authorAhmet, Begüm
dc.contributor.authorYaylı, Büşra
dc.contributor.buuauthorKILIÇ, İLKER
dc.contributor.buuauthorAhmet, Begüm
dc.contributor.buuauthorYAYLI, BÜŞRA
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Ziraat Fakültesi/Biyosistem Mühendisliği Bölümü
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0198-3550
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0087-6718
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-8340-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-8511-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridHKQ-2659-2023
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-28T08:33:37Z
dc.date.available2024-06-28T08:33:37Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to estimate the carbon footprint resulting from the functional unit produced in a dairy cattle (100 head), a sheep (80 head), and a layer hen (12000 birds) enterprises operating in the Bursa region. In this study, 1 liter of milk in the dairy cattle farm, 1 kg of meat in the sheep farm and 1 kg of eggs in the hens' farm are considered as functional units. Within the scope of the study, Tier 1 and Tier 2 approaches were used to estimate methane gas emission both from enteric fermentation and manure management.The results obtained at the end of the study are 0.4215-1.0693 kg CO(2)e / L milk, 0.0912-0.1002 kg CO(2)e / kg meat, 0.3834 kg CO(2)e / kg egg for Tier 1 and Tier 2 approaches, respectively. Since the data containing the Tier 2 approach for the poultry operation is not available, the calculation could not be made. In line with the results, processes such as adding quality and high-energy foods to feed ration, better planning of manure operating systems, and composting are recommended for reducing enteric fermentation.
dc.identifier.eissn1610-2304
dc.identifier.endpage4051
dc.identifier.issn1018-4619
dc.identifier.issue4A
dc.identifier.startpage4043
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20220463261
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/42572
dc.identifier.volume30
dc.identifier.wos000658172800010
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherParlar Scientific Publications (P S P)
dc.relation.journalFresenius Environmental Bulletin
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectMethane emissions
dc.subjectSystems
dc.subjectSheep
dc.subjectBeef
dc.subjectMeat
dc.subjectMilk
dc.subjectCarbon footprint
dc.subjectGreenhouse gas
dc.subjectTier approaches
dc.subjectCarbon emission
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectEnvironmental sciences
dc.titleComparison of carbon footprints of different livestock operations
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd0de0177-2480-40f5-84b7-2f5f1a2829d7
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationad0a2302-4af8-4366-a065-d31ead40a1c1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd0de0177-2480-40f5-84b7-2f5f1a2829d7

Files

Collections