Publication: Comparison of carbon footprints of different livestock operations
dc.contributor.author | Kilic, Ilker | |
dc.contributor.author | Ahmet, Begüm | |
dc.contributor.author | Yaylı, Büşra | |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | KILIÇ, İLKER | |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Ahmet, Begüm | |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | YAYLI, BÜŞRA | |
dc.contributor.department | Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Ziraat Fakültesi/Biyosistem Mühendisliği Bölümü | |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-0198-3550 | |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0003-0087-6718 | |
dc.contributor.researcherid | AAG-8340-2021 | |
dc.contributor.researcherid | AAG-8511-2021 | |
dc.contributor.researcherid | HKQ-2659-2023 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-28T08:33:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-28T08:33:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-01-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | This study aims to estimate the carbon footprint resulting from the functional unit produced in a dairy cattle (100 head), a sheep (80 head), and a layer hen (12000 birds) enterprises operating in the Bursa region. In this study, 1 liter of milk in the dairy cattle farm, 1 kg of meat in the sheep farm and 1 kg of eggs in the hens' farm are considered as functional units. Within the scope of the study, Tier 1 and Tier 2 approaches were used to estimate methane gas emission both from enteric fermentation and manure management.The results obtained at the end of the study are 0.4215-1.0693 kg CO(2)e / L milk, 0.0912-0.1002 kg CO(2)e / kg meat, 0.3834 kg CO(2)e / kg egg for Tier 1 and Tier 2 approaches, respectively. Since the data containing the Tier 2 approach for the poultry operation is not available, the calculation could not be made. In line with the results, processes such as adding quality and high-energy foods to feed ration, better planning of manure operating systems, and composting are recommended for reducing enteric fermentation. | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1610-2304 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 4051 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1018-4619 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 4A | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 4043 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20220463261 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11452/42572 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 30 | |
dc.identifier.wos | 000658172800010 | |
dc.indexed.wos | WOS.SCI | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Parlar Scientific Publications (P S P) | |
dc.relation.journal | Fresenius Environmental Bulletin | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
dc.subject | Methane emissions | |
dc.subject | Systems | |
dc.subject | Sheep | |
dc.subject | Beef | |
dc.subject | Meat | |
dc.subject | Milk | |
dc.subject | Carbon footprint | |
dc.subject | Greenhouse gas | |
dc.subject | Tier approaches | |
dc.subject | Carbon emission | |
dc.subject | Science & technology | |
dc.subject | Life sciences & biomedicine | |
dc.subject | Environmental sciences | |
dc.title | Comparison of carbon footprints of different livestock operations | |
dc.type | Article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | d0de0177-2480-40f5-84b7-2f5f1a2829d7 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | ad0a2302-4af8-4366-a065-d31ead40a1c1 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | d0de0177-2480-40f5-84b7-2f5f1a2829d7 |