Publication:
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool-updated version (pukat 2.0)

dc.contributor.authorYıldırım, Yasemin
dc.contributor.authorÇalışkan, Gülbahar
dc.contributor.buuauthorDallı, Öznur Erbay
dc.contributor.buuauthorERBAY DALLI, ÖZNUR
dc.contributor.buuauthorGirgin, Nermin Kelebek
dc.contributor.buuauthorKELEBEK GİRGİN, NERMİN
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı.
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2282-0846
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5882-1632
dc.contributor.researcheridABI-1236-2020
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-01T10:18:28Z
dc.date.available2024-11-01T10:18:28Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-08
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to determine the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the measurement tool developed and updated by Manderlier et al. to evaluate the nurses' evidence-based knowledge about pressure ulcers. Materials and methods: A methodological study design was used. The instrument was translated to Turkish and back-translated to English. A group of faculty members, including physicians and nurses who are experts in the subject area, evaluated the content validity of the tool with the Lawshe technique. A group of 240 nurses who met the inclusion criteria were reached, and then a pilot study was conducted with 35 nurses by using the testretest method to determine the invariance of the tool over time. The nurses in the pilot study were excluded from the overall sample, and the evaluations were performed with 205 nurses. Item difficulty index and discrimination index were used for the validity of the items since they were multiple-choice items; Kuder-Richardson 20 analysis was used to determine the internal consistency. Results: The translated and modified instrument demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties as follows: 1) overall content validity index was 0.90, 2) overall test-retest reliability was 0.83 (0.70-0.92 for the sub-themes), 3) item difficulty indexes were 35-75%, 4) discrimination indexes were 0.44-0.92, and 5) overall Cronbach's alfa for the internal consistency was 0.72. Conclusions: Similar to the earlier version, the Turkish version of PUKAT 2.0 was demonstrated to be a valid and reliable tool to evaluate the nurses' knowledge of evidence-based current information about pressure ulcers.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jtv.2021.08.001
dc.identifier.endpage57
dc.identifier.issn0965-206X
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage52
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2021.08.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/47321
dc.identifier.volume31
dc.identifier.wos000754396300008
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SSCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltd
dc.relation.journalJournal Of Tissue Viability
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectNurses knowledge
dc.subjectPsychometric validation
dc.subjectPrevention
dc.subjectPrevalence
dc.subjectInjury
dc.subjectRisk
dc.subjectCare
dc.subjectPressure ulcer
dc.subjectNursing
dc.subjectReliability
dc.subjectValidity
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectDermatology
dc.titleReliability and validity of the Turkish version of pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool-updated version (pukat 2.0)
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf5ea7325-3695-4e48-8e8b-24a8abdffba7
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa457eb47-d4c0-448f-92d1-9b122c063bb0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf5ea7325-3695-4e48-8e8b-24a8abdffba7

Files

Collections