Yayın:  Allocation of temporary disaster response facilities under demand uncertainty: An earthquake case study
Tarih
Kurum Yazarları
 Çavdur, Fatih 
 Köse, Merve Küçük 
 Sebatlı, Aslı 
Yazarlar
Danışman
Dil
Türü
Yayıncı:
Elsevier
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Özet
In this paper, we consider the problem of temporary disaster response facility allocation for temporary or short-term disaster relief operations, propose a solution approach and illustrate it with an earthquake case study in Turkey. A two-stage stochastic program is developed for the solution of the problem to minimize the total distance traveled, the unmet demand and the total number of facilities (considering the potential difficulties to access the facilities), where facility allocation and service decisions are performed in the first and second stages, respectively. An earthquake case study developed by the Prime Ministry Disaster and Emergency Management Authority (mostly referred as AFAD in Turkey) is used to test our model. We use five different scenarios, each representing a different after-disaster situation (i.e., traffic conditions, time etc.), with its respective probability of occurrence, to model the demand uncertainty for relief supplies. We first solve the deterministic model for each scenario, and then, the corresponding stochastic program. In addition to the defined objectives of the model, quality of each solution is analyzed in terms of average walking distance, demand satisfaction rate and average facility utilization.
Açıklama
Kaynak:
Anahtar Kelimeler:
Konusu
Geology, Meteorology & atmospheric sciences, Water resources, Disaster operations management, Disaster relief operations, Facility allocation, Relief supplies distribution, Temporary disaster response facility, Stochastic programming, Emergency response, OR/MS research, Evacuation, Model, Optimization, Formulation, Location
Alıntı
Çavdur, F. vd. (2016). "Allocation of temporary disaster response facilities under demand uncertainty: An earthquake case study". International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 19, 159-166.
