Publication:
Tenolysis rate after zone 2 flexor tendon repairs

dc.contributor.authorCivan, Osman
dc.contributor.authorGürsoy, M. Kemal
dc.contributor.authorCavit, Ali
dc.contributor.authorÖzcanlı, Haluk
dc.contributor.authorKaralezli, M. Nazim
dc.contributor.buuauthorCavit, Ali
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Ortopedi Anabilim
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4839-1747
dc.contributor.researcheridFZU-6956-2022
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T04:57:51Z
dc.date.available2024-07-18T04:57:51Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aims to evaluate the tenolysis rates of zone 2 flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) with flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendon repairs using four -strand technique and early passive motion exercises. Patients and methods: In this retrospective study, we performed zone 2 flexor tendon repairs in 149 patients (117 males, 32 females, mean age 33.3?12.9 years; range, 13 to 72 years) (82 right and 67 left hands) between November 2014 and January 2019. A total of 194 FDP and FDS tendons were repaired primarily by using modified Kessler and Bunnell methods. Patients underwent pure passive motion protocols after surgery according to modified Duran?s protocol. No active flexion components were added until postoperative fourth week. Results: Twenty-three out of 149 patients and 28 out of 194 fingers (14.43%) had tenolysis. There was no significant relationship between the number of operated fingers, gender, and tenolysis rate (p=0.836, p=0.584, respectively). Conclusion: The repair of the FDP with FDS tendon increases the tenolysis rate in zone 2. The tenolysis rate does not change according to the number or distribution of injured fingers and gender of the patient.
dc.identifier.doi10.5606/ehc.2020.71752
dc.identifier.eissn2687-4792
dc.identifier.endpage285
dc.identifier.issn2687-4784
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage281
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.71752
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.jointdrs.org/full-text/1121
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489179/
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/43319
dc.identifier.volume31
dc.identifier.wos000545984600017
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTürk Eklem Hastalıkları Vakfı
dc.relation.journalEklem Hastalıkları ve İlgili Cerrahi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectMobilization
dc.subjectOutcomes
dc.subjectPulley
dc.subjectAdhesion
dc.subjectFlexor tendon injury
dc.subjectFlexor tenolysis
dc.subjectPassive motion protocol
dc.subjectTenolysis
dc.subjectZone 2
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleTenolysis rate after zone 2 flexor tendon repairs
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Cavit_vd_2020.pdf
Size:
241.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections