Publication: 15 and 30 w holmium: Yag laser lithotriptor in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: Which one is more effective and safe?
dc.contributor.author | Kaygısız, Onur | |
dc.contributor.author | Aydın, Yavuz Mert | |
dc.contributor.author | Çicek, Mehmet Çağatay | |
dc.contributor.author | Çelen, Sinan | |
dc.contributor.author | Coşkun, Burhan | |
dc.contributor.author | Kılıçarslan, Hakan | |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Kaygısız, Onur | |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | KAYGISIZ, ONUR | |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Aydın, Yavuz Mert | |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | AYDIN, YAVUZ MERT | |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Çicek, Mehmet Çağatay | |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | ÇİÇEK, MEHMET ÇAĞATAY | |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Coşkun, Burhan | |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | COŞKUN, BURHAN | |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Kılıçarslan, Hakan | |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | KILIÇARSLAN, HAKAN | |
dc.contributor.department | Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Üroloji Anabilim Dalı. | |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-9790-7295 | |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-6287-6767 | |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-0471-5404 | |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-8242-9921 | |
dc.contributor.researcherid | JCO-5169-2023 | |
dc.contributor.researcherid | AFP-3055-2022 | |
dc.contributor.researcherid | L-9439-2019 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-12T06:31:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-12T06:31:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-05-05 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripsy with ureteroscopy (URS) was a safe and successful treatment option for pediatric ureteral stones. We aimed to comparatively evaluate the outcomes of 15 and 30 W Ho:YAG laser lithotriptors in pediatric ureter stones.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 55 children who underwent ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy to treat ureter stone size up to 15 mm between September 2009 and March 2020. Groups were formed according to the laser lithotriptor power 15 W (Group 15: n = 32), 30 W (Group 30: n = 23). The efficiency of laser lithotriptors was compared between the groups.Results: The age, gender, and stone characteristics (longest stone diameter, density, location and multiple stones) were similar between the groups. In the postop first month, stone-free status was achieved in all cases except one child in Group 15. The median operative time was significantly shorter in Group 30 (40 minutes) than in Group 15 (52.5 minutes) (P = .010). Clavien-Dindo class (CDC) 2 complications occurred in 2 children in both groups (P = .597). Although ureteric stenosis was observed in 1 patient in Group 15, no ureteric stenosis was seen in Group 30 during follow-up (median 16.1 months). Length of hospital stay (LoHS) and stone-free rates were similar between groups.Conclusion: URS with 15 and 30 W Ho:YAG laser lithotriptors is an effective treatment option for pediatric ureteral stones with a high success rate and low complication rates. In brief, 30 W Ho:YAG laser lithotriptors should be preferred over 15 W lithotriptors due to their shorter operative time with similar success rate. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1089/lap.2021.0090 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 842 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1092-6429 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 839 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2021.0090 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11452/42029 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 31 | |
dc.identifier.wos | 000648078300001 | |
dc.indexed.wos | WOS.SCI | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Mary Ann Liebert | |
dc.relation.journal | Journal Of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
dc.subject | Ureteroscopy | |
dc.subject | Laser lithotripsy | |
dc.subject | Pediatric ureter stone | |
dc.subject | Laser power | |
dc.subject | Science & technology | |
dc.subject | Life sciences & biomedicine | |
dc.subject | Surgery | |
dc.subject | Surgery | |
dc.title | 15 and 30 w holmium: Yag laser lithotriptor in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: Which one is more effective and safe? | |
dc.type | Article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | c7166d91-f1a2-4296-b6cf-6666152225e0 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 49cd940f-91a3-4155-afb4-206c37e08f29 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 7c4a68a5-1acc-4fc7-877a-59b23dc62d26 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 7e53dfda-90d9-48ee-acf2-c05fb2b33a29 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 97a09c20-e30a-413a-8e4b-2e773b1beb77 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | c7166d91-f1a2-4296-b6cf-6666152225e0 |