Publication:
Non-routine problem-posing skills of prospective mathematics teachers

dc.contributor.authorKozaklı Ülger, Tuğçe
dc.contributor.authorYazgan, Yeliz
dc.contributor.buuauthorKOZAKLI ÜLGER, TUĞÇE
dc.contributor.buuauthorYAZGAN, YELİZ
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Eğitim Fakültesi.
dc.contributor.researcheridA-6621-2018
dc.contributor.researcheridEHP-0027-2022
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-07T11:54:36Z
dc.date.available2024-06-07T11:54:36Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-23
dc.descriptionBu çalışma, 3-8 Temmuz 2018 tarihlerinde Umea[İsveç]’de düzenlenen 42. Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Kongresi‘nde bildiri olarak sunulmuştur.
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Problem-posing, an important component for developing mathematical thinking, is of great interest in integrating into classroom practice. Preservice and in-service teachers are expected to carry out high-quality problem-posing activities, and it is thought that non-routine problem-posing may be a good way to achieve this. In this context, this study focuses on non-routine problem-posing and aims to determine the characteristics of the problems that prospective mathematics teachers have posed. Research Methods: The study was carried out with 43 middle school prospective mathematics teachers in an elective course on problem-solving and problem-solving strategies. To analyse the data, descriptive analysis was carried out on the problems posed by prospective teachers. All problems were analysed according to the five criteria; problem type, contextuality, originality, complexity, and strategy. Findings: It has been determined that almost all of the problems have a single answer, include a context, have a low or medium level of complexity, and contain different problem-solving strategies. Although prospective teachers were asked to pose their own problems, almost half of them had posed similar, traditional problems. Implications for Research and Practice: These results show that prospective teachers can pose non-routine problems. Although this study provides some meaningful results, it is clear that it has limitations that require further investigation.
dc.identifier.doi10.14689/ejer.2021.94.7
dc.identifier.eissn2528-8911
dc.identifier.endpage168
dc.identifier.issn1302-597X
dc.identifier.issue94
dc.identifier.startpage147
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2021.94.7
dc.identifier.urihttps://ejer.com.tr/non-routine-problem-posing-skills-of-prospective-mathematics-teachers/
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/41888
dc.identifier.wos000686283700007
dc.indexed.wosWOS.ESCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAnı Yayıncılık
dc.relation.journalEurasian Journal of Educational Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectPreservice teachers
dc.subjectStudents
dc.subjectAbilities
dc.subjectNon-routine problems
dc.subjectProblem-posing
dc.subjectProspective teachers
dc.subjectEducation & educational research
dc.titleNon-routine problem-posing skills of prospective mathematics teachers
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationab954cf5-1f3c-47ed-ba96-b4a67114116f
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione935e04f-e484-4b3c-bc1d-0a0f47832f93
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryab954cf5-1f3c-47ed-ba96-b4a67114116f

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ülger_ve_Yazgan_2021.pdf
Size:
1.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections