Publication:
Impact of light-emitting diode and compact fluorescent light source type and cage tier on layers reared in an enriched cage system part 1: Production performance and egg quality

dc.contributor.authorTünaydın, Gülsüm
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz Dikmen, Bilgehan
dc.contributor.buuauthorTünaydın, Gülsüm
dc.contributor.buuauthorYILMAZ DİKMEN, BİLGEHAN
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Ziraat Fakültesi/Zootekni Bölümü
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4397-5428
dc.contributor.researcheridG-3725-2017
dc.contributor.researcheridEAY-3502-2022
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-22T10:05:52Z
dc.date.available2024-07-22T10:05:52Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.description.abstractThis study's aim was to investigate the effects of age, light source type (light-emitting diode (LED), and compact fluorescent (FLO)), and cage tier on production performance and egg quality traits of layers reared in the enriched cage system. A total of 800 Nick Chick White layers were used in the study. A total of 800 eggs were used for egg quality traits at 25 and 45 weeks of age. The enriched cage tiers were coded as I, II, III, and IV from bottom to top. Layer age significantly affected egg mass, hen-day egg production rate, hen-house egg production rate, feed consumption, feed conversion ratio, damaged egg ratio (P < 0.05), egg weight, shape index, shell thickness, albumen weight, yolk weight, shell weight, yolk color index, albumen ratio, yolk ratio, and shell ratio (P < 0.001). The higher egg mass, egg weight, albumen weight, yolk weight, shell thickness (P < 0.001), dirty egg ratio (P < 0.01), and lower FCR, yolk color index (P < 0.01), shell ratio (P < 0.01) were found in the FLO group when compared to the LED group (P < 0.05). Highest body weight was found in cage tier I at 45 weeks of age (P < 0.001). Level of cage tier significantly affected 50% egg production age, egg mass, hen-day egg production rate, hen-house egg production rate, and dirty egg ratio (P < 0.01). Level of cage tier significantly affected 5% egg production age, FCR, and shape index (P < 0.05). It can be concluded that the hens in the FLO group were better than the LED group in terms of some production and egg quality traits.
dc.description.sponsorshipMatlı Burdan Yumurta Üretim A.Ş., Bursa, Türkiye
dc.identifier.doi10.3906/vet-1903-74
dc.identifier.endpage626
dc.identifier.issn1300-0128
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.startpage615
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3906/vet-1903-74
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/veterinary/vol43/iss5/6/
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/43365
dc.identifier.volume43
dc.identifier.wos000488524400006
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTübitak Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
dc.relation.journalTürkiye Veteriner ve Hayvan Bilimleri Dergisi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectDifferent housing systems
dc.subjectLaying hens
dc.subjectProduction traits
dc.subjectFurnished cages
dc.subjectWelfare
dc.subjectPoultry
dc.subjectAge
dc.subjectSensitivity
dc.subjectParameters
dc.subjectResponses
dc.subjectLed
dc.subjectCompact fluorescent
dc.subjectCage tier
dc.subjectAge
dc.subjectProduction
dc.subjectEgg quality traits
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectVeterinary sciences
dc.titleImpact of light-emitting diode and compact fluorescent light source type and cage tier on layers reared in an enriched cage system part 1: Production performance and egg quality
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationfe1e6213-a9c6-4c89-830c-7917a8c2c276
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryfe1e6213-a9c6-4c89-830c-7917a8c2c276

Files

Collections