Publication:
Effect of ozone on bond strength of different restorative materials to enamel and dentin

dc.contributor.authorAta, Gül Dinç
dc.contributor.authorMüjdeci, Arzu
dc.contributor.buuauthorDİNÇ ATA, GÜL
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi/Restoratif Diş Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8272-5782
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-1497-2021
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T12:44:53Z
dc.date.available2024-09-25T12:44:53Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-25
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to examine the effects of ozone treatment applied at two different times, followed by the in vitro application of a reductant solution, on the shear bond strength of four different restorative materials to enamel and dentin. A total of 400 caries-free human molar teeth were randomly divided into enamel and dentin groups, and each was divided into five subgroups. The O20 group received 20-s ozone, O20 + R received 20-s ozone+reductant solution, O80 received 80-s ozone, O80 + R received 80-s ozone+reductant solution, and C was the control group. Each subgroup was then divided into four more subgroups based on restorative material (i.e., nanohybrid resin composite, silorane-based microhybrid resin composite, compomer, or conventional capsulated glass ionomer cement). After water storage for seven days, shear bond-strength data (MPa) were measured using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until fracture, and failure types were examined. The effects of ozone and ozone+reductant applications on enamel and dentin were examined via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Bond strength data were statistically evaluated using a three-way analysis of variance and Tukey's honestly significant difference test (a= 0.05). The bond strength of the control group was like that of the O20 group (p > 0.05), but it was higher than all other groups regardless of the type of restorative material or tooth structure (p < 0.05). Adhesive-type failures were found in most groups. Via SEM examinations, it was observed that ozone applications did not change the enamel morphology, but they did cause narrowing of the dentinal tubule openings in O80 + R.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01919512.2022.2115976
dc.identifier.endpage101
dc.identifier.issn0191-9512
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage89
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01919512.2022.2115976
dc.identifier.uri1547-6545
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01919512.2022.2115976
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/45253
dc.identifier.volume45
dc.identifier.wos000843568400001
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor
dc.relation.journalOzone-science & Engineering
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectCavity-disinfectants
dc.subjectFluoride release
dc.subjectResin
dc.subjectComposite
dc.subjectAdhesives
dc.subjectGas
dc.subjectPotassium
dc.subjectReversal
dc.subjectDevice
dc.subjectBond strength
dc.subjectDentin
dc.subjectEnamel
dc.subjectOzone
dc.subjectRestorative materials
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectTechnology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectEngineering, environmental
dc.subjectEnvironmental sciences
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.titleEffect of ozone on bond strength of different restorative materials to enamel and dentin
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication49e165e3-a6a7-45d3-a170-63562b5c6f6f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery49e165e3-a6a7-45d3-a170-63562b5c6f6f

Files

Collections