Publication:
Population dynamics of two diplectanid species (Monogenea) parasitising sparid hosts (Sparidae)

dc.contributor.authorEmre, Yılmaz
dc.contributor.authorEmre, Nesrin
dc.contributor.authorAydoğdu, Ali
dc.contributor.authorBuselic, Ivana
dc.contributor.authorSmales, Lesley R.
dc.contributor.authorMladineo, Ivona
dc.contributor.buuauthorAYDOĞDU, ALİ
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Mustafakemalpaşa Meslek Yüksekokulu
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2778-0273
dc.contributor.researcheridJCO-3521-2023
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-05T13:12:14Z
dc.date.available2024-08-05T13:12:14Z
dc.date.issued2015-03-01
dc.description.abstractEconomically important sparid fish species, gilthead (Sparus aurata) and white seabream (Diplodus sargus) (Sparidae) are frequently parasitised by diplectanid monogeneans, known to induce severe losses in farming conditions. We have analysed population dynamic of two diplectanid species, Lamellodiscus echeneis and Lamellodiscus ignoratus (Monogenea: Diplectanidae) collected from two bream species in the Beymelek Lagoon (southwest coast of Turkey), comparing it between different host variables (fish size, age and sex) in order to have insight in parasites' ecology, important for managing parasitosis in the intensive aquaculture system. In seabream (N = 127), L. echeneis prevalence was 46.5 % (exact 95 % confidence limits 38.90-54.14), mean abundance 5.64 (bootstrap 95 % confidence limits 4.20-7.65) and mean intensity 12.14 (bootstrap 95 % confidence limits 9.49-15.59). In white seabream (N = 102), L. ignoratus prevalence was 24.5 % (exact 95 % confidence limits 16.53-34.03), mean abundance 1.73 (bootstrap 95 % confidence limits 0.98-3.21) and mean intensity 7.04 (bootstrap 95 % confidence limits 4.60-11.40). Parasites' parameters differed only between seasons in both hosts and between age categories in gilthead, but not in white seabream.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00436-014-4278-x
dc.identifier.eissn1432-1955
dc.identifier.endpage1086
dc.identifier.issn0932-0113
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage1079
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-4278-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00436-014-4278-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/43717
dc.identifier.volume114
dc.identifier.wos000350039600029
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.journalParasitology Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectSparicotyle-chrysophrii monogenea
dc.subjectDiplodus-puntazzo cetti
dc.subjectSea bream
dc.subjectCommon carp
dc.subjectDicentrarchus-labrax
dc.subjectCyprinus-carpio
dc.subjectFeeding rates
dc.subjectFish
dc.subjectAurata
dc.subjectTemperature
dc.subjectSparus aurata
dc.subjectDiplodus sargus
dc.subjectLamellodiscus echeneis
dc.subjectLamellodiscus ignoratus
dc.subjectDiplectanidae
dc.subjectPopulation dynamic
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectParasitology
dc.titlePopulation dynamics of two diplectanid species (Monogenea) parasitising sparid hosts (Sparidae)
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6921b1bc-184d-4849-90f2-6bdd3174c981
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery6921b1bc-184d-4849-90f2-6bdd3174c981

Files

Collections