Publication:
The effect of postoperative sling immobilization and early mobilization on clinical and functional outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A propensity score-matched analysis

dc.contributor.authorMısır, Abdulhamit
dc.contributor.authorOğuzkaya, Sinan
dc.contributor.authorKızkapan, Turan Bilge
dc.contributor.authorSayer, Gokhan
dc.contributor.buuauthorEken, Gökay
dc.contributor.buuauthorEKEN, GÖKAY
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı.
dc.contributor.researcheridABE-9918-2021
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-07T05:29:29Z
dc.date.available2024-11-07T05:29:29Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.description.abstractBACKROUND: Optimal postoperative management is controversial after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR).OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate outcomes of patients with and without postoperative sling immobilization after undergoing arthroscopic RCR rotator cuff repair.METHOD: 369 arthroscopic full thickness superior rotator cuff tears (RCT) with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were included in this study. Propensity score matching was performed for age, sex, BMI, and tear size. Pain (VAS score), shoulder range of motion (ROM), functional outcome (ASES, Constant-Murley [CM] and Oxford shoulder score [OSS]), and health related quality of life (SF-36) scores were compared between patients with and without sling immobilization.RESULTS: According to the propensity match score, 92 patients (50 sling immobilization and 42 no sling immobilization) were matched to be almost identical in age (62.5 +/- 8.0 vs. 61.8 +/- 5.9), sex (female 78% vs. 76.2%), BMI (28.1 +/- 2.8 vs. 27.8 +/- 2.6), and tear size (2.7 +/- 1.1 vs. 2.9 +/- 0.8). The postoperative physical functioning domain of SF-36 scores was found to be significantly higher in the no sling group (p = 0.034).CONCLUSION: Early mobilization after arthroscopic small and medium sized full thickness superior rotator cuff repair is associated with improved ROM and quality of life scores.
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/BMR-210358
dc.identifier.endpage1398
dc.identifier.issn1053-8127
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.startpage1391
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-210358
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/47517
dc.identifier.volume35
dc.identifier.wos000886994100025
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIos Press
dc.relation.journalJournal Of Back And Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectSupraspinatus tendon
dc.subjectSurgical repair
dc.subjectPassive motion
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.subjectTears
dc.subjectReliability
dc.subjectManagement
dc.subjectTension
dc.subjectSling
dc.subjectRotator cuff
dc.subjectArthroscopic
dc.subjectFunction
dc.subjectQuality of life
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.titleThe effect of postoperative sling immobilization and early mobilization on clinical and functional outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A propensity score-matched analysis
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione043d6c8-a59d-46d5-acab-ac7843a03433
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye043d6c8-a59d-46d5-acab-ac7843a03433

Files

Collections