Publication:
Endovascular treatment modalities for basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: Experience of two centers and literature review

dc.contributor.authorKorkmaz, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorÇınar, Celal
dc.contributor.authorNas, Ömer Fatih
dc.contributor.authorHakyemez, Bahattin
dc.contributor.authorOran, İsmail
dc.contributor.buuauthorNAS, ÖMER FATİH
dc.contributor.buuauthorHAKYEMEZ, BAHATTİN
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3425-0740
dc.contributor.researcheridAAI-2318-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-8561-2021
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-10T10:19:05Z
dc.date.available2024-06-10T10:19:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractBackground/aim: The aim of this study is to present our experience on various endovascular treatment modalities of basilar fenestration aneurysms and reviewing our findings together with literature data. Materials and methods: A total of 26 basilar artery fenestration (BAF) aneurysms in 24 patients were endovascularly treated in two different neurointerventional radiology clinics. All patients had been evaluated with computed tomography (CT), CT angiography, and digital subtraction angiography before the procedure. Results: Aneurysms of all patients were successfully occluded (technical success rate 100%). Procedure-related complications were seen in two patients. Our comprehensive literature research revealed that studies related with the topic are composed mostly of case reports. In the literature, a total of 113 BAF aneurysms of 101 patients had been treated endovascularly in 46 studies between 1993 and 2019. Success rate of the treatment was reported as 97%, clinical success rate as 91%, and complication rate as 8.8%, while these rates are 100%, 92%, and 7.6% in our study, respectively. Conclusion: Although the number of cases is low in our study, to our knowledge, it is the widest series in the literature until today. Our results demonstrate that BAF aneurysms can be treated successfully and safely with different endovascular techniques, with more stent use in recent years.
dc.identifier.doi10.3906/sag-2006-352
dc.identifier.eissn1303-6165
dc.identifier.endpage1057
dc.identifier.issn1300-0144
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage1049
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3906/sag-2006-352
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/medical/vol51/iss3/19/
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11452/41925
dc.identifier.volume51
dc.identifier.wos000668244900018
dc.indexed.wosWOS.SCI
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTübitak Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
dc.relation.journalTürk Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectVertebrobasilar junction
dc.subjectSaccular aneurysms
dc.subjectCoil embolization
dc.subjectKissing aneurysms
dc.subjectStents
dc.subjectBasilar artery fenestration
dc.subjectAneurysm
dc.subjectEndovascular treatment
dc.subjectScience & technology
dc.subjectLife sciences & biomedicine
dc.subjectMedicine, general & internal
dc.subjectGeneral & internal medicine
dc.titleEndovascular treatment modalities for basilar artery fenestration aneurysms: Experience of two centers and literature review
dc.typeReview
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2aa7fdf5-f110-441f-b7ea-0d829a69f47b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9ad8c0f1-5154-4a82-b029-77c58cb35066
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery2aa7fdf5-f110-441f-b7ea-0d829a69f47b

Files

Collections