Schopenhauercı İsteme’den Nietzscheci Dionysos’a ya da kötümserliğin üstesinden gelmenin trajik karakteri
Date
2023-03-14
Authors
Şeref, Canberk
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi
Abstract
Bu çalışmada, en başta, Tragedyanın Doğuşu’nun Nietzsche düşüncesinin temeli olduğu fikri benimsenerek, bu metnin temel savını irdelemek amaçlanmıştır. Bir düşünürün fikirleri şüphesiz ki belli bir birikimden başlayarak şekillenir. İlk önce biriktirilen kütüphane, daha sonrasında özgünlük adına değiştirilecek ve dönüştürülecektir. Nietzsche için can alıcı bulduğumuz da Schopenhauer ile olan karşıtlığı bakımından budur. Bu sebeplerden, çalışmamızda Schopenhauer felsefesi ve estetik anlayışı, kaçınılmaz olduğu üzere Kant ile atılan temeliyle göz önüne alınmış, sonrasında Schopenhauer ve Nietzsche arasındaki göz ardı edilemez yakınlığa rağmen yine de radikal olan farklılık belirtilmiş, ardından da Nietzsche’nin antik Yunanlılarda gördüğü, tragedyayı kuran trajik bilinç serimlenmiştir. Tüm bu süreç boyunca göz önünde bulundurulan, Schopenhauercı kötümserlik ve Nietzscheci kötümserliğin ilişkisi ve farklı olmuştur.
In this paper, essentially, by adopting the idea that it shows the basis of Nietzschean thought, it is aimed to address the principal hypothesis of The Birth of Tragedy. For an intellectual, their ideas are surely formed after a certain reservoir. The library which has been accumulated in the first place, would then be changed and transformed in the favor of originality or autonomy. This is what we find crucial too in the case of Nietzsche within the context of his philosophical contrast with Schopenhauer. Therefore, in this paper, Schopenhauer’s philosophy and his theory of aesthetics and, as it would be inevitably necessary, their foundation on Kant’s philosophy are taken into consideration; afterwards, despite of an undeniable closeness between Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, their nonetheless radical difference is unfolded; and then the tragic mindset which Nietzsche has seen to have created the tragedy in the ancient Greeks is examined. And throughout all this process, relation and difference between Schopenhauerian pessimism and Nietzschean pessimism has been taken into account.
In this paper, essentially, by adopting the idea that it shows the basis of Nietzschean thought, it is aimed to address the principal hypothesis of The Birth of Tragedy. For an intellectual, their ideas are surely formed after a certain reservoir. The library which has been accumulated in the first place, would then be changed and transformed in the favor of originality or autonomy. This is what we find crucial too in the case of Nietzsche within the context of his philosophical contrast with Schopenhauer. Therefore, in this paper, Schopenhauer’s philosophy and his theory of aesthetics and, as it would be inevitably necessary, their foundation on Kant’s philosophy are taken into consideration; afterwards, despite of an undeniable closeness between Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, their nonetheless radical difference is unfolded; and then the tragic mindset which Nietzsche has seen to have created the tragedy in the ancient Greeks is examined. And throughout all this process, relation and difference between Schopenhauerian pessimism and Nietzschean pessimism has been taken into account.
Description
Keywords
Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Estetik, Müzik, Tragedya, Trajik insan, Aestethics, Music, Tragedy, Tragic man
Citation
Şeref, C. (2023). ''Schopenhauercı İsteme’den Nietzscheci Dionysos’a ya da kötümserliğin üstesinden gelmenin trajik karakteri''. Kaygı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, 22(1), 36-60.