Investigation of the effect of GaAs laser therapy on lateral epicondylitis

dc.contributor.buuauthorEmanet, Saniye Konur
dc.contributor.buuauthorAltan, Lale İnceoğlu
dc.contributor.buuauthorYurtkuran, Merih M.
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-1652-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid36140090600tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6603281363tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid55408539300tr_TR
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-22T10:51:12Z
dc.date.available2021-12-22T10:51:12Z
dc.date.issued2010-06
dc.description.abstractBackground and Objective: There are conflicting reports regarding the efficacy of low energy laser therapy in treatment of lateral epicondylitis (LE). Contradictory results are considered to be due to different joint treatment protocols regarding variables such as dose, duration, and frequency. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of gallium-arsenide (GaAs) laser therapy, which was performed with the dose regimen recommended by the World Association for Laser Therapy, in relieving pain and improving functional activities in patients with LE. Patients and Methods: Forty-nine patients (50 elbows) evaluated in our outpatient clinic were included in the study. Elbows were randomized into two groups: laser (n = 25) and placebo laser (n = 25). Either laser or placebo laser therapy was applied to patients for 15 sessions (5 d per week for 3 weeks). Main outcome measures were visual analog scale, tenderness, Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, the Patient-Related Lateral Epicondylitis Evaluation (PRTEE) test, pain-free grip strength, and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) questionnaire. Evaluations were performed before treatment, at the end of 3 weeks of treatment, and after the 12th week of treatment ended. Results: Upon post-treatment evaluation, a significant improvement in all parameters was observed for both groups (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found when the laser and placebo groups were compared. At the 12 week evaluation, a significant sustained improvement in all parameters was observed. On intergroup evaluation, a significant improvement was observed in favor of the active treatment group regarding pain with resisted extension of the wrist, tenderness with pressure, and for both the total and subgroup scores of the DASH questionnaire and PRTEE test, as well as for the pain subgroup of the NHP questionnaire (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Although low energy laser therapy had no advantage compared to placebo in patients with LE for the short term, a significant improvement, particularly in functional parameters, was achieved in the long term. Laser, which has relatively no side effects, might be included among long-term treatment options for LE.en_US
dc.identifier.citationEmanet, S. K. vd. (2010). "Investigation of the effect of GaAs laser therapy on lateral epicondylitis". Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, 28(3), 397-403.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage403tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn1549-5418
dc.identifier.issn1557-8550
dc.identifier.issue3tr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed19877824tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77953927849tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage397tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2009.2555
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/pho.2009.2555
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/23457
dc.identifier.volume28tr_TR
dc.identifier.wos000278707900013
dc.indexed.pubmedPubmeden_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Lieberten_US
dc.relation.journalPhotomedicine and Laser Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectLow-level laseren_US
dc.subjectTNF-alpha levelsen_US
dc.subjectTennis elbowen_US
dc.subjectPhysiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectIrradiationen_US
dc.subjectExercisesen_US
dc.subjectShoulderen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectGallium alloysen_US
dc.subjectGallium arsenideen_US
dc.subjectHealthen_US
dc.subjectParameter estimationen_US
dc.subjectSemiconducting galliumen_US
dc.subjectFunctional activitiesen_US
dc.subjectFunctional parametersen_US
dc.subjectGaAsen_US
dc.subjectGrip strengthen_US
dc.subjectLaser therapyen_US
dc.subjectLateral epicondylitisen_US
dc.subjectLong termen_US
dc.subjectLow-energy laser therapiesen_US
dc.subjectOutpatient clinicen_US
dc.subjectPlacebo groupsen_US
dc.subjectPost treatmenten_US
dc.subjectShort termen_US
dc.subjectSide effecten_US
dc.subjectTreatment groupen_US
dc.subjectVisual analog scaleen_US
dc.subjectLaser tissue interactionen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAdulten_US
dc.subject.emtreeArticleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeClinical trialen_US
dc.subject.emtreeControlled clinical trialen_US
dc.subject.emtreeControlled studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDiode laseren_US
dc.subject.emtreeFemaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHand strengthen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHealth surveyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeLow level laser therapyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMiddle ageden_US
dc.subject.emtreePain assessmenten_US
dc.subject.emtreePathophysiologyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeQuestionnaireen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRandomized controlled trialen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTennis elbowen_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshHand strengthen_US
dc.subject.meshHealth status indicatorsen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshLaser therapy, low-levelen_US
dc.subject.meshLasers, semiconductoren_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle ageden_US
dc.subject.meshPain measurementen_US
dc.subject.meshQuestionnairesen_US
dc.subject.meshTennis elbowen_US
dc.subject.scopusTennis Elbow; Medial Epicondylitis; Shock Wave Therapyen_US
dc.subject.wosSurgeryen_US
dc.titleInvestigation of the effect of GaAs laser therapy on lateral epicondylitisen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.wos.quartileQ2en_US

Files