Publication:
MR cisternography: Is it useful in the diagnosis of normal-pressure hydrocephalus and the selection of "good shunt responders"?

dc.contributor.authorAlgin, Oktay
dc.contributor.buuauthorHakyemez, Bahattin
dc.contributor.buuauthorParlak, Mufit
dc.contributor.buuauthorOcakoğlu, Gökhan
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi
dc.contributor.departmentRadyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3425-0740
dc.contributor.researcheridAAI-2318-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-8521-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-5180-2021
dc.contributor.scopusid6602527239
dc.contributor.scopusid15832295800
dc.contributor.scopusid7003589220
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-17T07:37:51Z
dc.date.available2021-12-17T07:37:51Z
dc.date.issued2011-06
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of MR cisternography (MRC) in the diagnosis of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) and in the prediction of the response to shunt treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-six patients with the diagnosis of "probable INPH" were included in the study group and 15 asymptomatic age-matched individuals were included in the control group. Pre-contrast T1-weighted (T1W) imaging was followed by intrathecal administration of 1 ml gadopentetate dimeglumine. Post-contrast T1W images were taken at the 12(th), 24(th) and 48(th) hours. The presence of contrast material in the lateral ventricles for more than 24 hours was accepted as a positive diagnosis of INPH. Data from both groups were compared statistically. Statistical significance was accepted for P < 0.05. RESULTS All of the INPH patients had remaining contrast material in their lateral ventricles at the 12(th) and 24(th) hours, while only 28 (78%) patients had contrast material remaining at the 48(th) hour after MRC. Only 3 (20%) of the control cases had remaining contrast material in their lateral ventricles at the 24(th) hour. No contrast material was present in the control cases at the 48(th) hour. The contrast material was found to be significantly more prevalent in the INPH patients at the 24(th) and the 48(th) hours compared with the control cases (P < 0.001). Shunt placement was performed in 14 INPH patients, and eight improved after shunt placement. All patients (100%) who improved after shunt placement had remaining contrast material in their lateral ventricles at the 24(th) and at the 48(th) hours. The sensitivity and specificity of MRC in the prediction of the response to shunt treatment were 100% and 17%, respectively. CONCLUSION MRC does not use ionizing radiation and is generally a useful procedure to diagnose NPH and to predict a positive response to shunt treatment; thus, we recommend MRC after routine MRI in patients with the presumed diagnosis of NPH.
dc.identifier.citationAlgin, O. vd. (2011). "MR cisternography: Is it useful in the diagnosis of normal-pressure hydrocephalus and the selection of "good shunt responders"?". Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 17(2), 105-111.
dc.identifier.endpage111
dc.identifier.issn1305-3825
dc.identifier.issn1305-3612
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.pubmed20683818
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79956318115
dc.identifier.startpage105
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.3133-09.1
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.dirjournal.org/en/mr-cisternography-is-it-useful-in-the-diagnosis-of-normal-pressure-hydrocephalus-and-the-selection-of-good-shunt-responders-13501
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/23350
dc.identifier.volume17
dc.identifier.wos000290705200001
dc.indexed.wosSCIE
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAves
dc.relation.collaborationYurt içi
dc.relation.journalDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectRadiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
dc.subjectCerebrospinal fluid
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imaging
dc.subjectNormal-pressure hydrocephalus
dc.subjectContrast media
dc.subjectPathophysiology
dc.subject3-d ciss
dc.subjectDisease
dc.subject.emtreeGadolinium pentetate
dc.subject.emtreeGadolinium pentetate meglumine
dc.subject.emtreeAdult
dc.subject.emtreeAged
dc.subject.emtreeArticle
dc.subject.emtreeBrain lateral ventricle
dc.subject.emtreeCase control study
dc.subject.emtreeCerebrospinal fluid shunting
dc.subject.emtreeCisternography
dc.subject.emtreeClinical article
dc.subject.emtreeContrast radiography
dc.subject.emtreeControlled study
dc.subject.emtreeDiagnostic accuracy
dc.subject.emtreeFemale
dc.subject.emtreeHuman
dc.subject.emtreeIdiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
dc.subject.emtreeMagnetic resonance cisternography
dc.subject.emtreeMale
dc.subject.emtreeNormotensive hydrocephalus
dc.subject.emtreePatient selection
dc.subject.emtreeSensitivity and specificity
dc.subject.emtreeTreatment response
dc.subject.meshAged
dc.subject.meshAngiography
dc.subject.meshCerebrospinal fluid shunts
dc.subject.meshContrast media
dc.subject.meshDiagnosis, differential
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshGadolinium DTPA
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshHydrocephalus, normal pressure
dc.subject.meshImage enhancement
dc.subject.meshMagnetic resonance imaging
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMiddle aged
dc.subject.meshSensitivity and specificity
dc.subject.meshTreatment outcome
dc.subject.scopusNormal Pressure Hydrocephalus; Intracranial Pressure; Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunting
dc.subject.wosRadiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
dc.titleMR cisternography: Is it useful in the diagnosis of normal-pressure hydrocephalus and the selection of "good shunt responders"?
dc.typeArticle
dc.wos.quartileQ4
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesi/Radyoloji Ana Bilim Dalı
local.indexed.atScopus
local.indexed.atWOS

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Placeholder
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: