MR cisternography: Is it useful in the diagnosis of normal-pressure hydrocephalus and the selection of "good shunt responders"?

dc.contributor.authorAlgin, Oktay
dc.contributor.buuauthorHakyemez, Bahattin
dc.contributor.buuauthorParlak, Mufit
dc.contributor.buuauthorOcakoğlu, Gökhan
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3425-0740tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAI-2318-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-8521-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-5180-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6602527239tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid15832295800tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid7003589220tr_TR
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-17T07:37:51Z
dc.date.available2021-12-17T07:37:51Z
dc.date.issued2011-06
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of MR cisternography (MRC) in the diagnosis of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) and in the prediction of the response to shunt treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-six patients with the diagnosis of "probable INPH" were included in the study group and 15 asymptomatic age-matched individuals were included in the control group. Pre-contrast T1-weighted (T1W) imaging was followed by intrathecal administration of 1 ml gadopentetate dimeglumine. Post-contrast T1W images were taken at the 12(th), 24(th) and 48(th) hours. The presence of contrast material in the lateral ventricles for more than 24 hours was accepted as a positive diagnosis of INPH. Data from both groups were compared statistically. Statistical significance was accepted for P < 0.05. RESULTS All of the INPH patients had remaining contrast material in their lateral ventricles at the 12(th) and 24(th) hours, while only 28 (78%) patients had contrast material remaining at the 48(th) hour after MRC. Only 3 (20%) of the control cases had remaining contrast material in their lateral ventricles at the 24(th) hour. No contrast material was present in the control cases at the 48(th) hour. The contrast material was found to be significantly more prevalent in the INPH patients at the 24(th) and the 48(th) hours compared with the control cases (P < 0.001). Shunt placement was performed in 14 INPH patients, and eight improved after shunt placement. All patients (100%) who improved after shunt placement had remaining contrast material in their lateral ventricles at the 24(th) and at the 48(th) hours. The sensitivity and specificity of MRC in the prediction of the response to shunt treatment were 100% and 17%, respectively. CONCLUSION MRC does not use ionizing radiation and is generally a useful procedure to diagnose NPH and to predict a positive response to shunt treatment; thus, we recommend MRC after routine MRI in patients with the presumed diagnosis of NPH.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAlgin, O. vd. (2011). "MR cisternography: Is it useful in the diagnosis of normal-pressure hydrocephalus and the selection of "good shunt responders"?". Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 17(2), 105-111.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage111tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn1305-3825
dc.identifier.issn1305-3612
dc.identifier.issue2tr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed20683818tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79956318115tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage105tr_TR
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.3133-09.1
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.dirjournal.org/en/mr-cisternography-is-it-useful-in-the-diagnosis-of-normal-pressure-hydrocephalus-and-the-selection-of-good-shunt-responders-13501
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/23350
dc.identifier.volume17tr_TR
dc.identifier.wos000290705200001
dc.indexed.pubmedPubmeden_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAvesen_US
dc.relation.collaborationYurt içitr_TR
dc.relation.journalDiagnostic and Interventional Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectRadiology, nuclear medicine & medical imagingen_US
dc.subjectCerebrospinal fluiden_US
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.subjectNormal-pressure hydrocephalusen_US
dc.subjectContrast mediaen_US
dc.subjectPathophysiologyen_US
dc.subject3-d cissen_US
dc.subjectDiseaseen_US
dc.subject.emtreeGadolinium pentetateen_US
dc.subject.emtreeGadolinium pentetate meglumineen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAdulten_US
dc.subject.emtreeAgeden_US
dc.subject.emtreeArticleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeBrain lateral ventricleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeCase control studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeCerebrospinal fluid shuntingen_US
dc.subject.emtreeCisternographyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeClinical articleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeContrast radiographyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeControlled studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDiagnostic accuracyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFemaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeIdiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalusen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMagnetic resonance cisternographyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeNormotensive hydrocephalusen_US
dc.subject.emtreePatient selectionen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSensitivity and specificityen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTreatment responseen_US
dc.subject.meshAgeden_US
dc.subject.meshAngiographyen_US
dc.subject.meshCerebrospinal fluid shuntsen_US
dc.subject.meshContrast mediaen_US
dc.subject.meshDiagnosis, differentialen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshGadolinium DTPAen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshHydrocephalus, normal pressureen_US
dc.subject.meshImage enhancementen_US
dc.subject.meshMagnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle ageden_US
dc.subject.meshSensitivity and specificityen_US
dc.subject.meshTreatment outcomeen_US
dc.subject.scopusNormal Pressure Hydrocephalus; Intracranial Pressure; Cerebrospinal Fluid Shuntingen_US
dc.subject.wosRadiology, nuclear medicine & medical imagingen_US
dc.titleMR cisternography: Is it useful in the diagnosis of normal-pressure hydrocephalus and the selection of "good shunt responders"?en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.wos.quartileQ4en_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: